yeah, coghlan did nothing wrong. the ball didn't go anywhere and he didn't run. that's the right decision. Well yeah, in a vacuum a runner on 1B probably shouldn't be going for 2B 99% of the time on that ball in the dirt/where it bounced/ended up, but when the runner on 2B goes for 3B he should've taken off on seeing that. no he should not have, because once you see the ball has not gotten past the catcher and therefore cannot run, you don't just reverse course and go to 2nd. He would have been even more delayed in going than Almora was and a very easy target for an out.