Yes, it has, and the single biggest reason is all the draft picks coming up, from years and years of high slots. The next biggest reason may be the death of daddy Wirtz, which opened the wallet. But much like Hendry, while he has acquired some nice players, he's overspent heavily to do so. Tallon may have played a significant role in making the right draft picks, much like how Hendry helped to improve the farm system when he was in that position (or at least the pitching that came out of that system - he couldn't do a thing with bats). I don't think it really matters if he "deserved" to be fired. I didn't want them to wait to see if he could figure out how to deal with the cap issues, and then suffer the consequences if he didn't. My belief was he wasn't up to the task of both acquiring solid players, and doing so efficiently as it involves the cap. The fact that Tallon signed an extension and willingly took the role he took tells me he at least partially agreed with the reasoning behind the move. As a guy in his late 50's still due his 2009/10 salary he probably wasn't hard up for cash and desperate for the job. And if he was a good enough GM that it was a mistake to fire him, he could have sat back and waited for the job offers. I still have my doubts about McDonough. You didn't have to be a genius to make Chicago like hockey again, you needed to put them on TV (a no brainer) and put a better team on the ice (something he has little to do with other than convincing the owner to spend). He knew little about the game of baseball and even less about hockey, but he's done fine so far in my opinion. The elder Bowman hiring was a great move, and as long as he's there I trust that the hockey people are making smart decisions.