I actually think his return could be more than his value to this team. He's far from irreplacable and hardly a difference maker. He's only been more valuable than Fukudome because of playing time issues. And he just turned 33. It really wouldn't take a huge drop in production for his value to be gone, like 2009. He's had a nice season, but he's probably getting praised for more than he's actually doing (the Mets announcers were slobbing all over him while disparaging guys like Fukudome and Ramirez - deservedly so on the latter). If the general consensus on Marlon is fairly high especially at his price you could get something significant for him and/or him and another player. After you list a multitude of negatives about Byrd, you then think some GM is going to give you "something significant" for him. Byrd is not a big-name player so I don't think any GM is going to give you anything signficant for him. He's been a very solid hitter for the past 4 seasons (all working with Jaramillo) and I don't see any reason to predict a huge drop in production. It doesn't have to be huge to have an impact. And he's 33, guys decline in their 30's. I don't see why there has to be a specific reason that he will decline, it happens to everybody eventually. He's got 2 years left on his deal at which time he will be 35 and it would be unlikely that he's with the team beyond then. They've got other people who can handle his job, and it's possible they could get serious value for him. Some low budget team hoping to contend may love to substitute his salary into the lineup. Marlon Byrd isn't going to be the difference between the Cubs contending next year or not, and he's not going to be selling tickets either. You don't have to move him, but there is absolutely no reason why you can't look into it and pull the trigger if something of value comes up.