I guess the Cubs are the only team to live by that theory. So you think Joe Borowski is a better pitcher than Rafael Betancourt? Yeah, I didn't think so. What seperates a closer from other relievers are save situations. Was today a save situation? No. What if Wood pitches a scoreless 9th and they go to the 10th or 11th still scoreless? Then another reliever is pitching in the exact same situation. Are they ore likely to fail in those situations because they aren't a closer. Wood came in because he was thebest pitcher available at that time, at least in LOu's mind. Also, why do you assume that since Wood blew a tie game that he's more likely to blow a save? Those are completely different situations. For example, have you seen Dempster's situations in save on non-save situations from last season? Probably not, because you're a Reds fan. Why don't you stick to the Reds? Of course there are cases where the closer isn't the best bullpen pitcher. I also don't think Todd Jones is better than Joel Zumaya, but I would say more often that not the best reliever is the closer. Besides, Borowski and Jones, while maybe not the "best" relief pitche,r have established track records as closers. Wood, does not. I know all about Dempster's struggles when not in save situations last year. I think that has to do with him not being a very good pitcher than it does anythng else. I watch the Cubs plenty.