Disagree. Because we won the 1st game against the Packers, the Bears can come into that Packers game, with a 1 game lead, tied, or down 1 game to GB and still be in a position where a win would give us the division and a loss would lose it for us. Even if we lost 3 of the next 4 games and limp into the Packers game at 9-6, and the Packers win 3 of their next 4 and come in at 10-5, a win in Lambeau will still win us the division. Now if we came into the game up 1 game and the Packers lost to the Lions and we beat the Lions and Vikings, then the game wouldnt matter as we would already clinch the division based on division record. If we came into the game up 1 game and the Packers lost 2 of their 3 remaining conference games (@ Det, SF, NYG) and the Bears won both of theirs (@ Det, @ Min), it would be the same scenario, except this time the Bears would win the conference record tiebreaker. We are in a pretty good position right now where as long as we win 1 more game, that last game will be necessary unless the Packers win their next 4. If we win 2 more games, that last game against GB is guaranteed to mean something. Yeah when I typed that my tiebreaker scenarios were off, I don't follow the schedule stuff much and just wait for others to break it down. I'll give it a little shot here though. The Bears screwing over their conference record is obviously bad news. If the Bears win against Det and Min, and one against the Pats/Jets they will be 11-4 going into Week 17. If the Pack lose only to the Pats they would be 10-5. If the Bears can't win in Lambeau then their division record evens up and the Pack win the division because of the conference tiebreaker. If I have that correct?, it seems like a pretty plausible scenario to me. Their wildcard chances must look a lot better after beating the Eagles. Although Roy giving the Saints a game doesn't help. I'm curious to see a breakdown of the Bears playoff hopes.