The issue with Tim Redding is that he's an absolutely terrible pitcher. As in, worse than Jason Marquis. Based on what? There's a difference between not being a healthy pitcher (like Mark Prior) and being a bad pitcher (like Marquis). Redding is not a terrible pitcher at all. Quite the opposite, he just hasn't been healthy. In 2003, his only relatively healthy season, he had an ERA+ of 119. He pitched in pain until he was shut down in 2004. He got in a whole 30 innings in 2005 before being set back and shut down again. He didn't pitch in 2006. Since coming back in the second half of '07, he's put together 27 straight starts with a combined ERA+ of around 115. My main concern with him is he's averaging just under 6 innings pitched an outing, but that should be expected given how little he pitched from the break in '04 to the break in '07. If you think Redding sucks, then you must think Prior sucks given his 2006 performance. You can't judge a pitcher as good or bad based on injury plagued seasons. If you want to assume that the only full season he's had is the only one that's actually indicative of his abilities, more power to you. Everything that he's done in his professional baseball career at any level suggest that he's pretty bad. I hope Jim Hendry won't use your line of thinking. His BABIP is also pretty low (.246).