Jump to content
North Side Baseball

stitchface

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    7,243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by stitchface

  1. Paxton? Oh, I thought he was a starter. I know nothing of this team, apparently. He has been. I just said that because he was listed as a possible target in the Pomeranz deal - throw him in pen for the rest of this year and then try to fix him as a starter. Cishek is also a possibility or Wilhelmsen. Lefties are Montgomery, Nuno, or LeBlanc.
  2. he has kinda been crappy this year but it would be fun I can't think of any of their relievers right now. Who would a bullpen guy be? Paxton?
  3. He claimed on a MiLB deal during the season I think? He's been at Iowa. He played 7 MLB games for the Cubs this year. btw, didn't Edwards debut last year?
  4. I didn't respond to your post but to the guy who posted his FIP as if that showed what an idiotic statement Sharma made. I don't know or especially care about Sharma or his opinions, honestly, so it doesn't bug me. I think if you wanted to pull up a weak contact rate you could make an argument. But pointing out FIP just shows that he benefits from his defense.
  5. no, that's not why...he's saying hendricks is more defense reliant than the others. well, it is excepting Hammel.
  6. Which is exactly Sharma's point . . . I have no idea why this bothers people. The Cubs defense is really good. It helps the pitchers. What? How is that exactly Sharma's point? It's literally the opposite. It proves Sharma's "point" to be silly. How? Sharma says he is made better by the defense. His FIP exhibits that relative to his ERA. Pretty simple stuff. He even says he is good pitcher - seems fair for that FIP.
  7. ...as evidenced by his dog [expletive] 3.33 FIP Which is exactly Sharma's point . . . I have no idea why this bothers people. The Cubs defense is really good. It helps the pitchers.
  8. Every break that went for the mets in new york is going for the cubs today.
  9. Love the foreshadowing caused by the mlbtv delay . . . that may have been longer than the first!
  10. They should tell him to beat that info into Olney also. Actually, Olney followed it up with......I get it, Schwarber is a lefty, middle of the order bat, that's 30/100 year in, year out. Can't trade that for a relief pitcher. You think there is a chance Schwarber catches and Conteras plays outfield?
  11. It looked like Montero missed his foot and I don't think it was so obvious his foot didn't get to the plate before the tag. Obviously it didn't since there was no appeal.
  12. I think that was pretty much a WAG WAG's that can't be proven wrong are the best kind of WAG's. His arguments are very reasonable!
  13. I think that was pretty much a WAG
  14. I still think that's too much. Vogelbach is fine, but giving up him plus a top 30 prospect (based on midseason prospect rankings) AND another top 100 guy (based on preseason rankings) is too much for a guy that has never pitched more than 63 innings in a season since becoming a full time reliever. He has value and fills a glaring need but you can take a risk in filling his 60 innings with internal options, lesser trades or scrap heap relievers. I said it was too much but I don't think Vogelbach is any good outside of the AL. Now, if they can confirm that the Indians aren't including Frazier or Zimmer then that changes the game. Zimmer and Frazier vs Torres and Happ is basically a wash. Do you guys have an opinion on how much Miller tilts the WS odds for the Cubs? 5%? 10%?
  15. O'Dowd's Miller trade: Torres, Happ and Almora
×
×
  • Create New...