Sorry, I missed your post, first time through.... There is WAY TOO much whining about DeRosa! Did I like him? YES, very much. Will the Cubs miss him? At times, probably. But with the Cubs determined to balance the lineup he would have diminished playing time and would have been very unhappy. He was a great fit for either the Twins or Indians, and he was paid too much to sit on the bench, when, unlike Fukudome, he could be profitably traded, and MOST of his usefulness could be replaced by a switch hitter who is much cheaper and two years younger. I thought most of the DeRosa complaining was because of who we replaced him with (Miles) not because of losing DeRo himself. I know that was my issue. Trading DeRosa to sign Bradley is a hmmmmmmm moment, but trading DeRosa to open a spot for Aaron Miles doesn't make a lick of sense to me. You guys need to back off a little so you can get a little broader perspective! Hendry's moves are not black and white. They are more like pieces to the giant jig saw puzzle that he sees coming together for next season. DeRo wasn't traded to open a spot for anybody. He was traded so he would be happy in the end, and Hendry would be more flexible in acquiring pieces that fit! I really hope you're wrong. Trading a productive player for a not so prodective player to make the productive player happy is kind of stupid. Get a little broader perspective! How "productive" was DeRo going to be sitting on the bench pouting about his lack of PT at this juncture of his career. The Cubs needed a "bench" player and Hendry usually tries to look out for the best interests of his players when he can, that's why they like playing for him, and why Free agents like Bradley and Dunn have pre-picked the Cubs as their target team and are patiently waiting to see if there is any chance. Why would DeRo be sitting on the bench if he was on the Cubs next season? Nice fake account posting, btw.