CubColtPacer

So, what good stuff has he done? You already tried to attribute a WS team to him that he was not in charge of. Can't believe I'm going to defend Amaro, but the fact that he has put together a team that has averaged over 97 wins the past three seasons is something. Hasn't helped them in the crapshoot that is the playoffs, but the regular season win totals have been pretty legit. The Phillies payroll is also 74 million higher than it was in 2008. He was also handed a good farm system to make trades with. 5 of the 8 offensive starters were already there, and 2 starters as well. Amaro has done some good things, but he had a ton to work with. He also managed to take a team that should have been good both now and later, and instead the future has been turned into a huge question mark despite their 170 million dollar payroll. He's been using all his available resources on his current team over and over again with no regard for the future, and that's a terrible way to run a baseball team. And now the future is quickly catching up to him. Their payroll should partially save him, but it gets tougher as the hole continues to get deeper.

The whole point of the way the contract is structured is that the Bulls aren't allowed to pay Asik more than 5 million for the first two years since he doesn't have full bird rights and the Bulls are over the cap. This exception they've built into the rule gives the Bulls a chance to match if they want. I think if the Rockets actually got him, for salary cap purposes his money would be evenly distributed. But the Bulls aren't allowed to sign him to a contract with this total value that is evenly distributed because he would make too much money in year 1.

You can't get more money in sign and trades anymore. They knocked that loophole out in the last CBA. The most money a player can be offered in a sign and trade is the max of what another team could have given them anyway. And sign and trades starting next year can't be done with teams who are more than 4 million over the luxury tax (so for example, the Steve Nash trade to the Lakers would be illegal next year). So the incentive for the player to do a sign and trade is much less unless he wants to go to a club that doesn't have cap space to sign him, and in that case Orlando would have to take back salaries. LA if they're offering Bynum won't offer lots of picks and cheap players to go with him. That's where Houston potentially comes in. They have everything Orlando wants. They have cheap players (including 3 first round picks from this draft). They have players on non-guaranteed contracts that can be used to match up salaries and then Orlando can just cut them later for no penalty. And they have future picks to trade, which LA doesn't have as much of since they just traded for Nash. Orlando can rebuild much quicker with that combination.

we're going to get 50 walks from our whole infield combined ostensibly, rizzo by himself will get more than that. Likely, yes. He hasn't shown that in the majors yet (he's swung at anything and everything so far) but his minor league track record would suggest 50-65 walks in a full season. He also won't be seeing 80% first-pitch strikes his entire career. The first pitch strike percentage just tracks how many times the count goes to 0-1 or the first pitch is put into play. So if Rizzo swings at the first pitch, that's automatically a strike for that statistic whether the pitch would have been called a ball or not. Rizzo has swung at 59.7% of pitches so far (easily the most among position players) and he's swung at 49.5% of pitches outside the zone (also easily the most among position players). Obviously a very small sample size, but he's been really aggressive so far, which is reflected in his tiny walk and strikeout numbers.

Yeah, I know. I would be willing to take him, probably gives you a better shot this season, if Rose comes back, then take my chances he stays. Worst case scenario is he leaves and you're probably not much more than a .500ish team for a year, then it's 2014 anyway. And you've got the same situation, minus the option of keeping or trading Noah. I don't think there's even a chance; if they did it it would basically be with the idea he's only here a year. If Rose was healthy I'd be all for that. The question becomes where would he go after the year. The Nets likely won't have the cap room for Howard unless they make trades (right now the 3 of Johnson, Williams, and Wallace will make 48 million or so next year by themselves). The Lakers, Heat, Knicks will all have too much money committed. As much as he may dislike Chicago, what other city would he be excited about in order to turn down the extra money? Howard can kick and scream all he wants, but unless he gets what he wants this summer he's rapidly running out of options.

we're going to get 50 walks from our whole infield combined ostensibly, rizzo by himself will get more than that. Likely, yes. He hasn't shown that in the majors yet (he's swung at anything and everything so far) but his minor league track record would suggest 50-65 walks in a full season.

When you talk about this free agency period, are you talking about the one next year or the one two years from now? If next year, I don't see how they will have a difference making amount of space even with amnestying Boozer (and if the reports that Hinrich has a 2 year deal are true, that will further cut into their space). They'll have some space, but not max contract type space. They could clear some space by renouncing Gibson, but will they want to let Asik and Gibson go two years in a row? Two years from now they could have a large amount of space if they either don't keep Gibson after next year or renounce Deng. But if they choose to keep both of them, they'll probably have no space at all even with Boozer being amnestied.

A) I'm assuming the Bulls cant afford him B) Strangely enough SG is like the 3-4th most important thing to worry about this offseason after backup PG, probably replacing Omer and replacing Korver our only outside shooter. Because Reinsdorf is cheap and doesn't want to hit the tax. A) I'm assuming the Bulls cant afford him It wouldn't just be Reinsdorf being cheap in this case. Mayo has already said he is not even considering mid-level offers, which is all the Bulls can give him (and that's assuming they cut players to get below the luxury tax. If they don't, they can't even offer him that much). So either he'll have to come well down on his demands, or the Bulls would have to do some sort of sign and trade. And Memphis is only a few million from the luxury tax themselves, so it would have to be a very good incentive for them to take on any more salary. It's possible to get Mayo to Chicago, but it would be difficult.

Jokes aside, are you saying that if you were another club, you wouldn't take a risk on Soriano's knee for 5 million total over 2 1/2 years? That's a pretty small risk to take for a player who can still give you a decent reward if things continue to go right as they have in the first half of the year.

Are the contracts for Korver, Brewer, and Watson guaranteed yet with the new league year? If at least two of them are, then I think the Bulls will hit the luxury tax this year unless they do something to cut salary elsewhere.

Well, I'd certainly call Szczur's production this year higher. An .800 OPS in the FSL with a .390 OBP is better value than an .830 in the PCL with a .340 OBP, and it really isn't that close. That's even taking into account the fact that one is a somewhat raw 22 year old in high A while the other one is 23 in AAA. Then you look at the other factors. Jackson definitely has a much better minor league track record before this year. Jackson also has the higher ceiling, although Sczcur is more likely to stick in CF. But I think I'd label Sczcur as the safer one to hit his ceiling at this point because of Jackson's strikeout issues and the fact that Sczcur is going to get more value out of his defense (which is more easily projectable than offense). While Sczcur is still 2 levels below which throws more uncertainty in, his BB/K ratio and his speed should make him less prone to numbers collapsing at a higher level than some other prospects. So I'd probably give it to Jackson, but I could see people putting Sczcur ahead because there are so few comparables to what Jackson is doing right now. While Sczcur has definitely taken some big steps foward as a prospect this year, if you put him ahead of Jackson that's more of an indictment of Jackson than anything IMO.

Every person I've heard thinks the Pacers will match, although it isn't guaranteed. I can't see Hibbert being overpaid by enough in that scenario to be worth losing an asset for nothing. It's not like the Pacers are likely to be able to lure another quality player for a fair money deal.

Really surprised the Pacers would go for the workout warrior who performed better at the combine than he ever did on the court. Hopefully he can somehow make a decent backup C.

Zeller is apparently going to the Cavs.

Gordon wants to go to Indiana (partly since his little brother has just hit high school). But the Hornets hold all the cards since he's restricted and the Pacers owner doesn't allow the Pacers to offer restricted free agents offer sheets, so it is still somewhat a long shot.

That's odd that Leuer got dumped by Milwaukee. He was a local guy (from MN, played in Madison) and I know UW grads that were going to games to see him. Granted he's a bench player, but why flush him for nothing as a throw in on this deal? You already have a bunch of players that the fans don't connect with. Oh well, maybe they franchise will just move. Put Bucks fans out of their misery. Dalembert for just Livingston and Brockman doesn't match up salary wise. Leuer was probably thrown in to make it a legal trade.

How old is Szczur? Want to talk about old for your league Rohan who's 4-4 tonight is 26. Szczur turns 23 next month. So not that old, but slightly older than your average top 10 type prospect in the FSL (IIRC). Plus he used his 1st of his 4? options this year, so that will play into things as well.

Not much too it. He doesn't have the pitch repitorie to make it through a line up two to three times, so he has to throw strikes. He literally has no margin for error. Entering today, he had the 11th highest strikeout rate and the 6th highest swinging strike percentage among starters in baseball (obviously today will bring that down a little). Whatever his struggles have been lately, how can those numbers be reconciled with the root cause being a lack of stuff?

I wonder how they're going to handle Szczur. In previous years, he would have been promoted around this time of year. He's of course slightly old for his level, has had 400+ plate appearances at Daytona between last year and this year, and has had good numbers this year in the offensively challenged FSL. I'm interested to see if the new regime wants him to stay there the rest of the year or not.

Sac flies count against OBP. Yeah, basically, he has more SAC + SF than BB + HBP. Sacrifice bunts unlike sac flies don't count against OBP, so they shouldn't be in that particular calculation.

Still think he's hurt in some way. Last season he had reduced velocity when he came back. This year he has gotten most of the velocity back, but has had a stunning lack of command (and great command is the reason he got to the major leagues in the first place). But whatever it is, he had a low enough margin of error in the first place that I doubt he ever really contributes to a major league squad again. He can't pitch at 90% of health and be effective like pitchers can who had better stuff to begin with.

I have to think he's still injured in some way. If his stuff just ended up getting exposed that's one thing. But he had a 2.9 BB/9 rate in the minors and was better than that his first two years in the majors. Now he seems to have no command at all. Last year he was leaving balls in the middle of the plate, and this year he is just avoiding the plate entirely. But he wasn't good enough in the first place for the team to spend a lot of time investigating/trying to rehabilitate him.

Correct me if I'm wrong but Vitters has been quite a disappointment overall the last 2 years and is just now showing signs of adapting to AAA and hitting with authority. There's really no need to rush him up here until Theo and Co. feel there's nothing left for him to prove. And in my opinion, he still has quite a bit to prove. Really, the difference between this year and last year can mostly be chalked up to the leagues he's playing in. Both years he's been solid enough but not good enough to really be knocking down the door to be promoted. If he shows April was more of an adjustment period than a cold streak, he has a chance to be better this year than last though by the end of the year.

Reading between the lines as best I can, I think people will be mostly disappointed with this offseason. I don't think the Cubs will be actively looking to add impact talent. If one happens to fit really well, I don't think they will reject it out of hand, but I believe their preference would not be to spend a lot of assets locking down a particular position just yet. However, I don't believe at all they're going to throw out a lineup of prospects next season. They'll likely spend more money than they did last year on free agents/trades. Especially if they trade Garza/don't resign Dempter, I don't see them having another massive drop in payroll. But IMO, they'll continue to add players they feel they can trade if they want to free up that spot later. Dejesus level players and probably even a little better than that (especially on the pitching side). I doubt you'll see a single contract over 40 million or so. But they'll be able to add enough of those players with how much money they have that the team should be a decent bit better next season. The goal will be not to block serious prospects while not letting any prospect with half a chance get significant time. I certainly don't believe they're going to actively try to tank next season. My guess is that they won't be willing to pay market value for an impact talent until the core gets a little bit bigger and they get a little better idea what positions will be difficult to fill internally. If for some reason an impact talent can be bought low, I'm sure they would take a serious look even now. But that's decently rare, so I don't see that happening anytime soon.

IMO, yes if the following things are true: Headley's numbers won't improve coming out of Petco, Vitters numbers this year are mostly a sign of development and not PCL fueled, and Vitters continues to reasonably develop (no breakout, but more improvement). If all those ifs pan out, Vitters would be in Headley's neighborhood (albeit slugging based instead of OBP like Headley has been the last two years) Of course, there are serious questions if Headley can keep up a .340 BABIP as he ages as well, so Headley's offensive numbers have reasons to go up or down from his current production.