Well, 24 commits to 20. To me, team rankings are incredibly useless. When you're trying to combine a bunch of kids who are ranked based on a faulty star system using an even worse team scoring system, you get a bunch of crappy numbers that don't mean anything. There's no decent way to compare recruiting classes so I don't even bother trying. It's hard enough trying to compare recruiting classes within the same program that you're quite familiar with. While I agree the star system and team scoring system are faulty, I still think it's worth considering. Taking either as gospel isn't the best idea, but using it as sort of a guide isn't bad. It comes down to a coaching staff's ability to evaluate talent and develop it, though. There are simply too many players to evaluate. You can take a look at the top 100 talent in the country and see how each team did recruiting those guys, but the biggest programs with the biggest subscribers tend to get the most focus when it comes to talent evaluation. Neither rivals nor scout has enough people to evaluate everyone, let alone re-evaluate them when new offers start coming in that catch people's attention. But it's not impossible to evaluate an individual player. You can look at highlight film, offer list, numbers, etc. The problem comes when those sites apply a secret formula to come up with a team ranking that relies almost as much on quantity as it does quality. It's impossible to compare a program that brings in nearly 30 kids every year to one that redshirts most of its freshman and signs less than 20. The difference between 25 and 30 is pretty significant, too. I just can't put any faith in the team rankings to even use as a guide as to how schools are doing. I know we all want to compare our program's recruiting to the rest of the conference, but it just can't be done right now. Personally, the best I can hope for is to compare this year's recruiting class for Northwestern to that of the last few years in order to get a sense as to how things are going. Part of that is which schools we beat out for each kid against our biggest recruiting competitors, but beyond that, the numbers are pretty meaningless to me. By the way, I found this list of rivals star rankings for this year's All Big Ten team: Defense: 5 stars (2), 4 stars (4), 3 stars, (6), 2 stars (1) Offense: 5 stars (0), 4 stars (4), 3 stars, (3), 2 stars (5)