Jump to content
North Side Baseball

imb

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    31,206
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    112

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by imb

  1. West Virginia is really turning into fullback U
  2. i wouldnt trade marmol for oswalt straight up
  3. lol, is that what happened? You're taking a hell of a beating in this thread, that's for sure. The ref might need to stop this fight before you get hurt. next time I'll put my comments in green so that people know there was sarcasm involved. my mistake. put them in invisible
  4. What are Augustin's draft chances? If the Sonics end up with Beasley, I really hope Augustin falls to 24. An Augustin/Durant/Beasley trio would look pretty sweet in OKC next year.
  5. it's not really about judging talent, it's about judging production. Looking at just ERA after four or five starts is going to give you so incomplete a picture that it's basically useless. You wouldn't look at a guy's OPS after five games and say "well, that tells us all we need to know." Hill hasn't given up a ton of runs, but with as many baserunners as he's allowing, it's by the grace of kent that he hasn't. I really think that the Cubs are worried about Hill's confidence, rightly or wrongly. They're pulling him after 5 innings or 80 pitches in games where he may not have pitched well but hasn't allowed a lot of runs, they're skipping him in a tough matchup. I think they're convinced that his mechanical issues are confidence based and they are going to do their damnedest to keep him from getting smacked around.
  6. 2008: 15-6 2007: 8-13 2006: 13-8 2005: 11-10 2004: 13-8 2003: 13-8 2002: 8-13 2001: 13-8 2000: 7-14 1999: 11-10 1998: 12-9 1997: 4-17 1996: 10-11 1995: 14-7 1994: 6-15 1993: 10-11 1992: 7-14 1991: 10-11 1990: 10-11 1989: 11-10 1988: 9-12 1987: 11-10 1986: 8-13 1985: 14-7 1984: 12-9 1983: 6-15 1982: 7-14 1981: 4-17 Best start in my lifetime. No matter how this year ends, I hope everyone is taking the time to enjoy how it started. Also: Best start since 1975 when the Cubs also started 15-6 Doh: Cubs finished 75-87 in 1975.
  7. yes it does
  8. For the record, it took Lou seven seasons to win his 100th game with the devil rays
  9. no, that's incorrect.
  10. Doesn't get much dumber than Lou tonight. I'm sorry if it offends anyone. I think if we all chipped in $10, we could pay Rob Dibble to take out Lou for us. YOU WANNA BE A MAN?
  11. i really feel like im in an alternate universe and these are the bizarro cubs how long can stuff like this keep happening has my world moved on?
  12. is reed johnson on first yet? wells is a walk machine
  13. Careful getting down from that cross. It doesn't sound like you're an unbiased source here. I can't dispute what you said, because it's all a person's opinion. You wouldn't expect Cubs fans to have an accurate opinion of White Sox fans would you? And, I'll usually be the last person to back up some of the tools at Cubs games.(See my rant titled the 4 people you meet at Cubs games.) The throwing all the balls on the field was stupid. Throwing trash on the field in the past was stupid. But this type of obnoxious tool behavior DOES happen everywhere. And at a pretty similar ratio. As CubinNY alluded to, you can't claim that us who rely on stats so heavily in baseball should be able to realize the ratio is greater, and then use your anecdotal evidence to prove it. It's flat out an opinion, and there's no way to prove it. Brennamen's biased, he's a Reds announcer and a senile old coot. We're biased, we're Cubs fans. You're biased, you're a Sox fan(I think) Oh well. First of all, is it that far fetched to think that I might be banned after my first post? I appreciate not getting banned (thanks) but it doesn't seem to take much to get the "troll" label and threatened with banning. you, for all intents and purposes, call cubs fans drunken idiots and you expect to be called a troll? i'd say that you are anticipating well. what my data says is that things are the same, lenny dykstra was getting beer dumped on him 20 years ago and he'd get doused tomorrow. in philly, mike schmidt was getting booed 25 years ago and he'd get booed tomorrow. in new york, alex rodriguez always gets booed. in addition to things being the same at wrigley, things remain the same at every other park. from battery night to disco demolition to the attack on tom gamboa, virtually every fan base has it's share of drunken idiots---and if they don't, the team leaves town due to lack of interest. anecdotal evidence, yes, but just as convincing. i believe you mean intensive purposes
  14. if he's such an mvp then why is his ankle broken
  15. hey truffle, is the woman's intuition that's telling you that Cedeno will never improve above his age 23 season the same one that told you that Eric Patterson was a future mlb stud?
  16. He's got a ways to catch Cedeno's .957. doesn't matter... you don't bench a guy OPS'ing .893. lol, you're still holding on to theriot, huh?
  17. my math (i dont have any data) says
  18. Lebron vs. Kobe is a tough call, because I think Kobe is a better player, but Lebron's statistics are mind blowing
  19. yes
  20. KG turned around a team that was 24-58. Yes Ray Allen helped that out alot, but Garnett was the best player on the best team this year. He was the leader of the best team in the NBA. If that isn't MVP material then a I dunno what is. And to say Al Jefferson was better than him, im sorry then I don't want to talk NBA with you anymore. KG's year was just a tad better than Jefferson's (25.3 PER to 22.8) but we're also talking about $23m and $2m. The other top guys go like this Kobe Bryant 24.3 Chris Paul 28.3 Lebron James 29.23
  21. when the entirety of your argument is that you think it's possible that he may have done steroids, it's probably a good idea to shut up
  22. I don't think they are considered, nor should they be considered, journalists. They are entertainment. I didn't say he was a journalist, i believe the announcer should try to be as unbiased as possible. I realize an announcer that follows a team day in and day out have the biases, but its their job to try to avoid that. Not only did Mary miss that boat, he went as far to insult an entire fan base and tie the fan base to the organizational problems. You'd think cub fans would get some credit for being die hard for a team that doesn't win. Home team announcers aren't supposed to be unbiased.
×
×
  • Create New...