Jump to content
Can the Cubs get the sweep? Come join our game thread! ×
North Side Baseball

imb

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    31,165

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by imb

  1. imb
    he was talking about notre dame
  2. imb
    So if you've seen no proof that clutch exists, why do you keep acting like you're sure it does? Back it up with evidence or stop talking about it like you're holding onto some knowledge that everyone else is skipping over.
  3. imb
    It sure was good to see those Oilers uniforms in action last night. In fact, that was a battle of the two best uniforms in NFL history.
  4. imb
    you can't say something mean and then get upset when someone calls you on it, that defeats the purpose.
  5. imb
    No he wouldn't. He played this season, the other 2 didn't. And I'm not sure Glavine makes it 1st ballot. 300 wins is no longer automatic for HOF voters? This is so weird.... on the one hand people say what an overrated stat pitcher wins is. However, a lot of those same people will use this as a criteria for HOF induction. how can you not tell the difference, here? anyone can luck into a season where things go right and they win 18 games when they were just average. No one can luck into 300 wins. You win 18 games in a year... so what, so did Russ Ortiz. You win 300 games, you were good.
  6. imb
    i love it when they turn on each other
  7. imb
    diamondmind, what does teabag mean. like if you were to teabag me like you said you wanted to, what would you be doing to me? i've never heard of that before.
  8. imb
    AND THEN TO RUB IT IN WE GET A FREECREDITREPORT.COM COMMERCIAL!!!!! [expletive] THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH.
  9. imb
    Bradley's OPS is almost up to .800
  10. imb
    .
  11. imb
    you cant claim someone who has already passed through waivers, that's the whole point of the system
  12. imb
    I'd love for Cano to be here, but I don't think the Yanks will trade him. But I agree, though. Put in the claim and see what happens. you cant "claim" players that have passed through waivers here's a link on the whole process
  13. imb
    this year im partial to big-ass TDs
  14. imb
    ah thank you
  15. imb
    agree to disagree, i guess. i like to see good people succeed. i guess that's where we differ.
  16. imb
    why? i like josh hamilton. reading comprehension > you sorry, i dont revel in other's misfortunes a) but i do? no. now you're just making things up b) you don't, really? really? then what do you call constantly making fun of dead people? I don't know, I'd rather root for a good person in a tough situation than hope for them to stumble.
  17. imb
    why? i like josh hamilton. reading comprehension > you sorry, i dont revel in other's misfortunes
  18. imb
    Haha, that's ridiculous. Dave Otto remembers what happened to Steve Stone. Hahaha.
  19. imb
    i cant wait till we win the world series and all the fake-ass cubs fans that are only fans of wallowing in self-pity will go become fans of the [expletive] indians or something
  20. imb
    cut this [expletive] out, please
  21. imb
    erik, you say this a lot, sarcastically, like it implies that there is a clutch. it would be nice if you would try to back this up with something other than your own worthless words. thanks. there is such a thing as clutch; however, it's generally a non-repeatable skill and to make future decisions based on it would be stupid. Hey, man. Back those words up otherwise they're worthless! I'll admit to not being the biggest stat guy around. However, logic simply dictates that if anti-clutch exists, then clutch exists as well. I'm not trying to prove or disprove the existence of either, but if one exists, so does the other. If nothing else, this particular stat proves that our favorite baseball team is indeed anti-clutch, but then if they are, then there is a way to be clutch as well. No. This is what I was talking about when I mentioned clutch situations. A guy comes to the plate in a clutch situation and he hits a home run. Looking at that at bat, the result was clutch. If he had grounded out, the result would have been anti-clutch. This doesn't mean that the player himself is anti-clutch or clutch, just that the result of the situation was.
  22. imb
    Happy Ca$h day
  23. imb
    aside from derek jeter, obviously. well duh
  24. imb
    there are clutch situations. i'm not sure i believe in guys who can consistently raise their level of performance based on the situation.
  25. imb
    erik, you say this a lot, sarcastically, like it implies that there is a clutch. it would be nice if you would try to back this up with something other than your own worthless words. thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...