That isn't true. I know you think it's true, but it isn't. You've got a narrative in your head for my posts, and while it's not entirely unfair, it also causes you to imagine a lot of posts I didn't make and ignore posts that don't fit that narrative. I don't think it really matters, but being accused of saying things I didn't say always irks me. I'll cop to taking a perverse glee in the bad things happening, to saying doing some incredibly annoying venting after the 2008 series was over, and to becoming obsessed for a few weeks with the idea that there was at least a possibility of some kind of magical unspecified "cause" that was causing the Cubs to underperform in playoffs. But specifically saying there was almost no chance because they lost game 1? I haven't checked every post, but it doesn't sound like me and I haven't seen it in the game threads I've looked at, and given your recent history of refusing to accept that I was one of the most optimistic posters about Cubs in-season chances the last few years, I find it likely I didn't say it. This got boring and stupid, so I'll throw this out there: For this entire season, I've made it a point to read your posts with Pierce Hawthorne's voice in my head, and it's amused me every time. Edit: Here's what I said before game 2 in 2008: http://www.northsidebaseball.com/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&f=26&p=1983816 I think he was joking about 7%. A generic team would be about 15%, we're not a generic team, we're a darned good one with favorable pitching matchups in 3 of 4 remaining games (game 3 absurdly so). I'd say closer to 25%. tl;dr