You got good points. But I don't think all of them are valid. Increased revenue for owners like 1 million percent-I know 1,000,000 is an exaguration on your point but your point still has merit. Players make way more than they used to without having to agree to a salary cap-true Nearly every team got a new stadium, most had a great deal of public funding-I'm not sure that's such a good thing for the various communities The Wild Card was implemented and has led to numerous wild card champions-The best thing he did Baseball got some great TV and advertising revenues-true Competitive balance has been nearly as good as football, despite the lack of a salary cap- completely disagree. You have to be really smart in small markets. Minnesota has sucess but Kansas City has not. There are many teams that know they don't got a chance every year. While in football everybody thinks they got a chance. Baseball returned to Washington DC, the nation's capital-time will tell if this is a good thing. Others teams have failed here. After a few years the Nationals may be struggling financially too. Attendance is at its highest point ever, both in terms of total attendance and % of seats sold-true He has done good things but I think baseball could do better with someone else.