And Paterno didn't literally enable a child rapist, and there isn't literally a plausible case that Paterno actively covered up for him by downgrading the seriousness of the allegations when he reported it to the AD and President. Oh wait, those are both literally true. I have been looking for some details of what Paterno told the AD and it wasn't in the deposition on ESPN. What did he say that downgraded the seriousness? The grand jury's report describes what the GA saw in rather graphic detail that I'd rather not retype. Then it says that the GA "reported what he had seen" to Paterno at the coach's home the morning after it happened. Paterno then told the AD and President the report, but changed it to "fondling or something of a sexual nature," according to the grand jury report. So we are left with a few possibilities. 1) The G.A. did a poor job of explaining to Paterno what he saw. 2) Paterno was carrying water for his friend by changing what the G.A. saw to something that sounds a little less serious. 3) The Grand Jury report was wrong. We don't have enough evidence to know which of the three it is, but No. 2 sounds awfully plausible to me. wow. If that is true, just ugh, these people are deplorable.