Purdue is 0-1 at home this year against major conference opponents. Illinois is 1-0 on the road this year against major conference opponenets. Ok you played Missouri....and we played Duke....my point is made Actually, Illinois played at Vanderbilt. Missouri was on a neutral site, along with the Kent State and Tulsa victories. My point is there's a context and relevance to everything. Sure, Purdue won over 90% of their home games the past 2 years. Which means nothing for this year. Sure, they beat a lot of patsies at home this year. Means nothing. The only good team they've played at home, they lost big. This, too, means nothing. All that really means something is how good of a team Purdue is vs. how good of a team Illinois is. According to Ken Pomeroy's stat ratings, they're almost dead even, with a slight edge to Purdue. He projects Purdue to have a 66% chance of winning, and predicts a 66-62 final score. According to Jeff Sagarin, Purdue is about 1.6 points better than Illinois on a neutral court. Home court is a 4-point bump, so he projects a 5-6 point Purdue victory. Both projections sound about right. The only disappointing result tonight for Illinois would be a double-digit loss. and I don't think we will beat you by double-digits, but I think Purdue will win....My point was that Purdue has been amazing at home the last few years including this year...It does matter because we have almost the exact same team as last year on the team this year. We lost badly to a very good team in Duke at home in won of the worse shooting performances I've ever seen from Purdue. Beating Vanderbilt on the road and Missouri on a neutral court are impressive wins, but those teams aren't as good as Duke...All in all it should be a competitive game unlike the last few times you guys played us at home