Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. The DH doesn't magically get rid of bad hitters on the team. There's never going to be enough good hitters to fill the starting lineups of all the teams. The DH doesn't magically mean "ALL THE DONGS" either No, but it does means more dongs. And I seriously doubt that the #9 spot in the AL puts up comparable numbers with the pitchers' spot in the NL.
  2. The DH doesn't magically get rid of bad hitters on the team. There's never going to be enough good hitters to fill the starting lineups of all the teams.
  3. Opponents of the DH often throw out things like "why not just have 9 DH's and 9 designated fielders?!?" and in all honestly I'd probably enjoy that a lot for the reasons you laid out. You could end up with some really entertaining specialized talents. Think of it like how teams are broken up in the NFL.
  4. The difference, to me, strategy-wise is negligible. There IS a difference; one league has a clear advantage over the other and they have to play each other. It's just a point in terms of the scope of the game; it's not like we're only talking about the MLB and minors and amateurs. Almost all collegiate and international leagues use it in some fashion, too. It's simply not just an NL vs. AL issue. It's the NL vs. almost everyone else.
  5. Bottom line, this is THE argument that's unavoidable; the DH is used in some way by almost every major baseball organization except for the NL and Japan's Central League. It's simply not realistic to think all of that is going to reverse and that it'll go away, and it's pointless to put the NL at a disadvantage because of what amounts to little more than emotional attachment. Something has to give to do away with the disparity, and the NL adopting the DH is what's by far the most realistic option.
  6. Things like 3 catchers actually becomes far less of a problem.
  7. Plus the people complaining about the loss of "strategy" always ignoring that a game of Battleship with a hole in the middle has more strategy.
  8. But seriously, yes, I would like to have it as an option to keep a player like that who can still give you value with the bat and you don't have to risk breaking them down quicker by having them play the field. Obviously everyone is glad they got Bryant in hindsight, but at the time they let him go because of his age and the assumption his value would drop sharply, largely due to him having to man 3B as he got older. In the future, I'd like them to have the option to hold on to, say, Soler or Bryant a few years past what would be ideal if they had to keep playing defense but could still give you value with the bat.
  9. The DH had nothing to do with Aramis heading elsewhere. He would've just cost us Kris Bryant. Shut up and let me rant, you walking fart.
  10. http://mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/The-Office.gif
  11. More dongs = more good. Aramis could have ended his career as a Cub if we had this, you DH-hating monsters.
  12. http://media.giphy.com/media/2WDKW6TCEqnJe/giphy.gif Good times, good times.
  13. http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view1/1203960/chocolate-giddy-up-o.gif
  14. Imagine when we fast-forward to later in the season when Soler and Russell teach us how to love and laugh again.
  15. Yeah, I don't care about anything "political;" it's just a really boring and needlessly somber moment in the middle of what's supposed to be a fun game.
  16. It's been a thing for 14 years Not "we're not going to commercial and please rise and remove your hats and salute the flag" like that was. For the record, he said face the flag, not salute it. This is the GAME thread, not the POLITICS thread. I would be most grateful if we could all take our political opinions and store them at body temperature and out of direct sunlight. Thanx. It's whether or not people like the song/moment as part of the stretch. It's little different than the discussions we've had about guest conductors singing in the 7th.
  17. It's been a thing for 14 years Not "we're not going to commercial and please rise and remove your hats and salute the flag" like that was. It just depends on the team/broadcast. Plenty have been showing it over that time, sadly. It's tedious, but it's not new.
  18. He's not horrible, but the Bulls are better with Niko. So play Niko. He's very far from horrible. And he's not blocking Mirotic.
  19. This is stupid, I want the Cardinals at their worst. It's like people who talk about the Cubs winning the WS dramatically in game 7. I'd much rather have a boring 4 game sweep.
×
×
  • Create New...