I disagree, a ton of value was tied to his contract situation. He was making like $8-9 million on average for the next half decade (through age 30-31 IIRC) when they acquired him. Given his durability, contract, age, and production the trade made sense for a team that at the time had 3 guys they'd comfortably start over him in a playoff series but needed certainty and innings behind those guys. They gave up a pre-injured SP prospect drafted outside the first round out of HS and an oft-injured COF/DH prospect (not that Eloy can't and won't mash, just like fellow giants Soler or even Cruz to some extent it might take a while to both stay healthy and mash), it's not as if teams would be falling themselves to give up a potential rotation lead for those guys. The optics of that trade suck most because "top 5 prospect" is a phrase that carries alot of weight and counts as analysis these days Not that I'm not annoyed he didn't come in and deliver nearly 10-15 WAR his first 3 years like Lilly did, but the signs were all there that he was more towards that 3-4 starter than a Lester just as the signs were all there that Jimenez and Cease weren't going to light the world on fire immediately. Quintana's best years came during that little deadball era at the beginning of the 2010s, his numbers were climbing with the league's offense (still fine)...This guy was just supposed to be a part of the puzzle, same with Davies, with the offense and more tested guys on the pitching staff taking the lead Lotta words Honestly, this reads like a lot of damage control to try and paint it better than it worked out. Based on his track record to that point and what they gave up, there's basically no chance the Cubs weren't thinking/hoping they just made a move for a top of the rotation starter. The Theo years had a lot of bad pitching moves or ones that didn't pan out, and this falls into the latter. I don't fault them for it; almost everyone thought it was a great move at the time, myself included. But they most definitely were not trading for what they thought would just be some mid tier working slob-type. Lumping him in with the same intentions behind getting a reclamation project guy like Davies is pure revisionism.