I bet you said the same thing about Theriot too. Theriot is the rare exception, not the rule. You don't play/manage in the hope or expectation of that rare exception. Yeah they have higher upside but if Fuld can sustain he brings a suitable style of play to the leadoff spot. What makes Fuld sustaining any kind of serviceable offense realistic? This isn't Kiddie Corner Training Skool. He needs to play well for the majority of the year considering his contract. Your apologizing for this outfield is becoming legend. Who is "apologizing?" I want the Cubs to maximize what they have. They need to work with they've been dealt with instead of throwing in the towel and playing never-will-be's like Sam Fuld. Fukudome has been incredibly frustrating, but he has also shown he can succeed at the MLB level. It should just be common sense to work towards making that happen again because a non-slumping Fukudome kicks the crap out of anything someone like Sam Fuld is likely to provide in fulltime play. You want to take this ridiculous, hardline, all or nothing approach towards this team that if actually applied would actually just make them even worse than they have been. ....a $14 million player who is used in a platoon. That tells you quite a bit. So because someone is making a certain amount of money you give up on them completely and indefinitely go with the mediocre minor leaguer? If the Cubs can find a way to trade Fukudome with minimial financial obligations, great, go for it. If they could then upgrade CF, fanatastic. But right now, as things seemingly stand with the sale of the team and the financial situation, this is what the Cubs have. A Fukudome/Johnson platoon isn't ideal, but it's a FAR better option than playing Sam Fuld instead as much as possible. Bradley has a recent track record of success at the DH spot which keeps his legs fresh. Fuku has no real track record of success in MLB. Bradley's hitting issues really don't seem to be stemming from "unfresh legs" much, if at all. Fukudome does have a track record of sustained periods of success thus far in the MLB. No, it's not for the majority of his playing time, but it's there, especially this year in that he was able to initially adjust his approach at the plate and do it again for brief stretches. Again, it's not ideal that he's still not able to do that all the time, but it can't be ignored because when he's able to stick with those adjustments he's an excellent hitter. We've seen that experiment against real pitching. I believe it's in the "0-6" file. Soriano has had much succees against "real pitching" over his career. He hasn't only feasted on bad pitchers.