Arguing that Fuld would ultimately be the better option if your only choices for a fulltime OFer were either him or Dye and the season started tomorrow is likely a sound conclusion. Dye really is THAT bad in the outfield when he's out there as much as possible. What that doesn't necessarily translate to, however, is that Fuld would be better than Dye if both are used in the relatively limited support roles they should be in, even if someone goes down with an injury that requires them to be out there longer than is ideal. It's questionable at which point Fuld becomes a better option than Dye since Rob's argument has hinged on looking at them projected over a full season. Besides, the answer seems simple if an OFer went down for a significant period of time: platoon Fuld and Dye. Dye primarily faces lefties, who he can still hit, and it helps offset his defensive liabilites. If 2 starting OFer's go down, well, sorry, but you're likely fucked no matter who you have on the bench.