Yes, everything you've brought up so far. Ridiculous. You made a declarative statement as if it's a given that under Ricketts the Cubs will no longer have a payroll of at least $120 million. You're spinning statements about a focus on developing players from within as well as making smarter FA signings to mean that the payroll is going to be drastically slashed. The Ricketts very well may opt to cut the payroll drastically down the line, but as it stands right now they have given little indication that that is the case. Your declaration that "the days of the $120 million payroll are over" is something, for the time being, that you have made up. Soriano and Zambrano's contracts aren't these crippling albatrosses that people love to paint them ass. Within the next two years the Cubs shed Lee, Lilly, Fukudome and Dempster's contracts. Aramis is not necessarily someone they're stuck with. His NTC makes it difficult for him to be moved, but far from impossible, and there is still a decent chance he opts out. Vitters potentially could end up being their 3B. The Cubs don't need to replenish the corner IF and OF spots all with prospects. You're presenting this as some either/or scenario that hinges on your fantasy that the Ricketts are slashing the payroll and will refuse or be unable to sign any big FA's in the coming years. Hmmmm, maybe that's the kind of thing best served by letting a very young player have more time to develop in the minors instead of starting their arb clock early, something which flies in the face of the scenario of the cash-strapped Cubs you've created.