I don't remember them signing Pena to "get more lefthanded." In fact, I don't recall any good right handed options at first base this offseason. You had Dunn, Adrian Gonzalez, Nick Johnson and Pena as the best options there (that I recall). All lefties. Assuming we couldn't/wouldn't match what the Red Sox gave up for Gonzalez, our best two options were Dunn and Pena. Dunn cost a ton and is unproductive so far, Pena cost a little and is unproductive so far. Hendry, to my knowledge and memory, never entertained the idea of signing Berkman. I don't mean to say that he would be duplicating the season he is having with the Cardinals, but it is looking like a major mistake that the Cubs did not even consider him as an option. Meh, it's one of those things that seems to make sense in hindsight when going back to the off-season when both were looking at 1-year-deals after coming off of bad seasons. Wasn't Konerko an option as well? Not that I would have been in favor of that particular signing either, but I'd expect Cubs brass to have a good handle on who they are adding to their team through deep scouting and game films, etc... Milton Bradley and Carlos Pena are not making these decision makers look too good right now. Come on, Konerko? What are the odds he was going to sign with anyone but the Sox? He wanted to stay there and they wanted to bring him back and ended up getting a 3-year-deal from the Sox. Who would want the Cub's to top a 3 year, $37.5 million deal to a 35-year-old Paul Konerko? And come on, are we really going to get pissed that they didn't pick Berkman over Pena? Yeah, at this moment I wish we had Berkman, but it's a 1-year-deal for two post-32-year-old players coming off crappy years.