I'd like a real No. 1 pitcher, to not have 40% of the projected rotation rocking horrible ERAs this season, and to not have the No. 2 starter showing signs of wearing down over the last few years. We are seeing that rotation without Wilson suck out loud right now, so I don't think it's that hard to imagine a scenario in which that rotation is the weak link that prevents a pretty good offense from contending next season. Like I said, they might as well go for it because they've got the money to spend. That doesn't mean I have a lot of faith in it working. Sure, you could have 2/5's of the rotation go down again, but on paper that's a damn good 1-5. Your breakdown of the rotation this year is pretty faulty since it seems to hinge on ERA.