I thought I was sadly indifferent to Wood's career finally coming to an end, but seeing that clip of the ovation and his reactions just killed me. So long, Kerry.
Man, I don't know; in hindsight those Jordan-lead Bulls teams were like watching the Justice League of basketball. I'll take that over eking out a championship any day.
Detestable or intriguing? Seems to me like you can't get enough. You've probably spent more time commenting on my posts than any other poster on this board. Must be the similarities we share like being Grade A douches/losers with dreams of being known as the most alpha poster on a message board. I can't WAIT 'til I my post count is enough that I can drop one judgmental line on a post and walk away with that little tingly feeling I have zero doubts you get (I got em good!). Sure, why not.
I saw this pop up on a newsfeed and was hoping for something decent since it was the WSJ, but man, that was hideous. Stupid me for thinking it would be an examination of how local businesses and politics impact the financial ability of the club and even the physical condition of the stadium itself.
Just embrace it. I have no problem with my meatballiness. I just want to be accepted by you, the greatest poster in the history of the Cubs. Ehhhh, not really meatball-y enough. Being that petulant is, I dunno...being a pork chop?
Because he's younger (25) and signed for six years, not 29 (as Hamels will be next season) and looking for 8 years. Because he likely won't get 7-8 years. He's been very consistent. His concern over signing Hamels is due to Hamels' age and how many years he's reportedly looking for and has a good chance of commanding because pitchers (especially older ones) are so much more of a crapshoot of lasting over such a long contract.
If they could get him for something like 5 years I'd be all for it. I'm terrified of what is going to happen to his body as he gets older after what he's put it through.
Good point. Should they start Bryant against Oklahoma City or has Steve Blake overtaken him? I don't get the snark or the wasted hours of MJ research. Did he have a unwhelming game? Yes. That's all that this discussion was about. 17 points on 16 shots is underwhelming. Doesn't mean he's NOT an all time great or that no great players have bad playoff games, just that this particular game was bad. No need to make a mountain out of an anthill. Yes, you dropping that little nugget immediately after pages of people trying to make the argument that Kobe Bryant is overrated makes it ridiculous for anyone to assume that you too shared that opinion.