Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,036
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    206

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. And for the longest time the home run was basically shunned as being "unsportsmanlike" and pitchers were expected to essentially always pitch entire games. Things change. It basically exists in some capacity at every level and in every organization except the NL; the tide clearly isn't going to shift the other way.
  2. That's like winning a biggest pile of garbage contest. I'd much rather to be able to sign piles of meat who can only hit vs. stumbling across the rare Zambrano or Travis Wood or Jason Marquis. It's not like you'd be depriving a starting pitcher of their chance to be actually valuable.
  3. Because teams are about to get that national TV deal, in general are more profitable, and there's less competition from other top FAs. It was a cruddy FA class last year and there were a bunch of teams with money to spend. There's still more money this year. Bourn was the 7th-highest FA contract of the season. Are there six guys in line to get a bigger payday than Ellsbury? Maybe. Or maybe none of them get a humungo payday. There was more than enough money last year to drown Bourn with cash. Just because there's more money now doesn't automatically mean someone like Ellsbury is going to get a contract twice as big.
  4. I mean, if this is some kinda roundabout way of calling out racists, I'm all for it.
  5. Because teams are about to get that national TV deal, in general are more profitable, and there's less competition from other top FAs. It was a cruddy FA class last year and there were a bunch of teams with money to spend.
  6. Orrrrrr they spend it on a really good DH.
  7. Why is Ellsbury going to blow the Bourn contract out of the water? I could see Ellsbury easily getting more, but 2 years and $52 million more?
  8. I guess I read it wrong. Still don't think he's getting $100 million.
  9. at least a few years ago, DH had the highest average compensation of any position in baseball. not having the DH keeps their payroll marginally lower, rather than needing to find/pay another very good hitter. That's horrible logic and I want to fight you for it, you Ricketts narc.
  10. I think people are going to be surprised when they see the offseason contracts this year. There's very little to spend money on, but a lot of teams have a lot of money. Most of them aren't going to just not spend it. Total money available is going to be divided among the available free agent class, even if it's bad. We're agreeing too much. But that's not agreeing with you.
  11. Ellsbury isn't getting 6/$100 million. You go after a guy with his history because it's going to allow you to get him for a more a manageable contract. Teams aren't tossing out stupid huge contracts for guys like him.
  12. Crap, if a player doesn't play well it's detrimental to the value of his contract? How did I never see this before?
  13. But it does give the Cubs an inherent advantage over the current situation; they'd suddenly have another position they can fill with someone like Aramis or Abreu or Vogelbach instead of having to go, "welp, they're monsters defensively/fat turds/old guys, can't take advantage of how they can hit." It's not like it's something unique to them, but I'd prefer to have more offensive options over trotting out a pitcher just because. The NL is basically the only holdout in this regard. And you'd still have plenty of batting changes based on which relievers are out there. I mean, yeah, it's what I grew up preferring, but right now I'm for anything that helps the Cubs have a better team.
  14. Hurts...so...BAD.
  15. i like those guys a lot, but don't you have to sort of just think this franchise is in serious trouble? there's just no way all of the top guys pan out, and even from the top four, aren't you realistically doing well if you get a very good (though non-star) player and a couple acceptable starters out of that group? Despite the all prospect team nonsense being tossed out, you have to assume some of these guys are going to be traded. Not all of them are going to be here to have the opportunity to bust.
  16. How does the pitcher batting actually help the Cubs in any way?
  17. Why does this possibly matter.
  18. That stuff, plus trades. Seems pretty ridiculous to be throwing out the "but what could they do?!?!" attitude already.
  19. Looks like one of those "Here ya go Reds, you can sweep us" kind of lineups That would be applicable to any lineup the Cubs put out there right now. BECAUSE THEY STINK, GET IT. Good, I'm glad you get it. Do I need your permission to vent my frustration? Whut? I was raging at the Cubs.
  20. Looks like one of those "Here ya go Reds, you can sweep us" kind of lineups That would be applicable to any lineup the Cubs put out there right now. BECAUSE THEY STINK, GET IT.
  21. Take the chance on beast.
  22. Rizzo needs to earn back my love. He's been a stale fart in the second half and is just getting worse.
  23. Depressing you because he's going to be breaking hearts and inspiring dreams for another team? I agree.
  24. Wait, he didn't die a few years ago? I had a conversation, like, two weeks ago where all three of us thought he was dead.
×
×
  • Create New...