Could you imagine being some 18-year-old kid who's getting ready to move into the dorm and then being told you couldn't move in, and that your scholarship wasn't being offered to you anymore? Yeah, that's some [expletive] and something has to be done about it. Sounds like Big Slick has a bigger problem with the upper classmen having their schollies taken away, which I have absolutely no issues with. They are year-to-year grants in aid that are based on athletic ability, and if you're not good enough to maintain one, I don't see why any coach should be forced to keep offering them to you. However, I do think that if a coach signs more freshmen than he can feasibly get into school, he should face some sort of penalty for it. Not exactly sure what would be fair, but I agree that coaches who sign freshmen and then make them greyshirt or something else are reprehensible. I'd love to see the NCAA step in and set firm rules on this and punish offending institutions (by taking away one scholarship per oversigning?) These are student-athletes. You might as well pay the players a salary if you're going to treat them specifically as athletes and take away their scholarships if they aren't the athlete you thought they were. These kids are students first and foremost, and I think they have a right to finish out their degrees if they were given a scholarship. It's too much of a business. What's the difference between pulling a scholie for not maintaining a high enough GPA and pulling a scholie for not playing well enough? I mean really, these guys are students of football (especially at top tier programs that consistently put guys in the pros) as much as the guy in the engineering school is a student of engineering.