Cork doesn't help you hit the ball any farther and may actually be a hindrance to home run hitters. It's effect is entirely psychological. Ron was outstanding, but Sammy was better. I'm not arguing whether or not the stuff works...we all know it has an extremely negative connotation in MLB, and is pretty much one of the worst things you can do on the field. If it doesn't actually help, it just makes Sammy look even stupider for getting caught with it. I'm a young guy, Sammy is responsible for some of the greatest moments I've seen as a Cubs fan and probably will ever see...but the overall package of "Sammy Sosa, ballplayer" weighs him down below guys like Santo. What about the intense humanitarian work he did following the hurricane in the Caribbean (I think it might have been "Mitch)? He was recognized by the president at the State of the Union address. That's pretty impressive off-the-field behavior. He did one thing wrong and it was overhyped in order to run him out of town. I didn't begrudge his off the field behavior and actions, nor did I applaud his being run out of town. I simply am not impressed with the corking, the ego, the early departure and the stink about the batting rotation. Add onto that the excellent stat analysis provided by others here and I think that Santo ultimately belongs in the top 5 more than Sammy. Yes, I fully realize that a lot of the negative stuff was blown out of proportion...but they all happened, and it tarnishes him, in my opinion, as a player. Like I said, I think he is one of the top 10 greatest Cubs of all time...just not in the top 5. I didn't say you did, but if he had some on the field problems, but has done some great work off of the field, can't those cancel to an extent? I mean, everyone's talking about how nice of a guy Santo is off the field. All I was saying is that Sammy has done a LOT of stuff too.