I disagree. In a person neutral setting I'd take Demp over Wood. Contracts ignored. Carlos Zambrano and Rich Harden are liable to miss a combined 20 starts or so. I wish i was exaggerating, but I am not. Jason Marquis, while crap, is useful as a safety blanket if Zambrano or Harden go down. If we acquire Peavy and deal away Marshall, which is inevitable in such a trade, then we no longer have the safety blanket. If we acquire Peavy and sign Dempster and retain Marquis, we do have one, a pretty damn good one too. Agreed. Also, if Harden does good this season and stays healthy, he would probably fetch like 14 million a year next offseason. We can't just assume that the payroll will continue to rise every year. If we lose Harden (and don't resign Dempster), then we would have Peavy/Z/Lilly/?/? going into the next offseason. And if Harden is injured alot of next season, then we still have the same problem since we are uncertain how much he is able to pitch healthy for throughout the next season. It's alot easier to find bargain one inning relief pitchers than it is to find bargain starters who will probably give you 200+ innings with around a 3.40 ERA and 1.30 whip (my projected stats for Dempster next year). I'd rather have Peavy/Z/Lilly/Dempster locked up for sure with our main task being to find a decent bullpen guy, rather than having Peavy/Z/Lilly/?/? with Wood closing games. Edit: I'm not 100% sure on our payroll going into next offseason, so maybe i'm wrong and we can easily fit Harden extended. Still, he could easily have injury problems like always (hopefully not though). I'm not advocating 5-75 though.