Jump to content
North Side Baseball

sneakypower

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    13,399
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by sneakypower

  1. if you get the bunt down, win exp goes from .438 to .477 the problem is i don't trust Soto at all for that
  2. the first three are every week starters; dont overreact to Forte's big day vs an undersized D this is the right thinking, though it looks like Hightower is vulturing James' TDs. I still like him better for yardage than Ocho.
  3. there are like 7 options better than giving K-Rod $75m
  4. torres toast
  5. Turner looked good, but the Lions had some terribly inept tackling on display all afternoon. There were wide lanes for both RBs to run through; who would have thought Rogers' loss would leave them extremely light on the line? Not Millen & Marinelli, I guess.
  6. well he was the director of baseball development in 2004-05, so i guess he inherited it from himself. you're really missing the point on this; it's not a lifetime achievement award.
  7. it'd be nice to have 1 sacrificial "overreact to something stupid a beat writer printed" thread so we could confine all madness to a singular place i'd learn to avoid
  8. he behaviored his way out of town. obviously i'm aware of his transgressions; it doesn't really justify selling a player at rock bottom value. his talent was still immense and the player compensation was ineffectual so why not give him a shot in RF with the opening there and if he does more knucklehead crap to cause a distraction you can release him with no harm done. it never made a lot of sense. i hate this criteria, because it basically gives no reward to a gm who has built his team cost-effectively through the farm system. i think a more reasonable guideline would be to give the award to the general manager who has done the best job of putting together the 2007 ballclub, rather than the general manager who has done the most in the past calendar year to put that team together. and he still inherited most of their young talent. Garza and Pena were great moves, as well as the reworking of the bullpen, but there have been other GMs who've done even better jobs in that timeframe.
  9. How has the LD% looked?April: 21.6% in 28-1/3 IP May: 25.5% in 27-2/3 IP June: 17.3% in 29-1/3 IP July: 11.7% in 26 IP August: 20.6% in 30 IP Sept: 12.8% in 13-1/3 IP 18.4% opp LD since the start of June
  10. i think i'll consider this a rare occurrence that i was right about something. back in early May he looked like DFA material, but was a victim of a bloated BABIP at the time. he's turned it around as his luck has better evened out. true to form though, I did also say we'd lean heavily on Hill in the playoffs so win some, lose some I guess...
  11. I don't see those 3 comparisons as much because all have considerable value in their superb defense, but what's made sense to me is Garret Anderson with a slightly lesser level of peak production of course that would be assuming all goes fairly well; still, Anderson's milb stats were pretty crummy pre-AAA
  12. he's actually hit his worst at 2B 2B: 280 PA - 823 OPS 3B: 52 - 996 LF: 88 - 913 RF: 96 - 896
  13. wait why use warp3 for the same season?
  14. i'm guessing Derosa's hurt in the VORP comparison by his OF, 3B time roberts 121 ops+ .297 eqa 7.6 warp derosa 123 ops+ .295 eqa 7.6 warp these two guys are twins this year also deserving mention is that we dont seem to be suffering from the void of a true leadoff hitter
  15. i don't think that's entirely fair to derosa, as roberts has an 88 PA advantage
  16. i don't like the guy who traded Elijah Dukes for peanuts being mentioned for the Executive of the Year Award besides, so much of the core of that team was already in place; the two Chicago GMs are far more deserving this year
  17. a better point would revolve around Roberts = no Harden
  18. Willie Harris leads the Nats in HR Ronnie Belliard leads in OPS
  19. soriano makes my balls swell
  20. that's fine, let's throw Sewell out of the mix. you're still left with Tony Gwynn at 87 and Pierre at 188 as the only two players in remotely modern time to show up on the list; granted, i just eyeballed the list and i'm not even going to bother with felix fermin. #2 is a non-factor. Pierre's remarkable K avoidance is essentially the only thing separating him from the hundreds of other unemployed track stars like Eric Reed & Nook Logan. there's really no shortage of players who put primary emphasis on contact in practice. look at just about every team's crappy utility player.
  21. what the h 114 K in 7132 AB; thats what, 2 months worth of K for Mark Reynolds spead out for 14 seasons. but impressive as that is, i think that really speaks a lot to the kind of stuff pitchers had in those days. yadier molina - 163 k in 1720 ab (9.4%), 98 iso bengie molina - 365 in 3865 ab (9.4%), 135 iso juan pierre - 308 k in 5117 ab (6%), 70 iso joe sewell - 1.6 K%, 101 iso there's just nothing comparable to that right now. juan pierre registers as the 188th best K rate in history, and nellie fox is the only guy within the top 20 who played in games past the early-1950s, retiring in '65. this is one of many reasons i'm convinced pitchers didnt have nearly the movement on breaking balls we're seeing today. really the only other explanation would be umpires having far stricter strike zones on pitchers, uniformly. i also like sewell's 3 for 19 in steals for 1927
  22. its about as bad as fans singing a kinda dumb song after each home win
  23. and because his glove is stellar
  24. SF building for the future
×
×
  • Create New...