as much as i hate to dignify any of PCPs posts, what are pessimists trying to argue? if you've got a ballclub who wins at a .600 clip, is that unsatisfactory without consistency? are we of the mindset that consistency is an achievable dream and the team can go 3-2 in every 5 game stretch? or are we considerably more talented than just a .600 team? i really don't get any of this. nobody was complaining about inconsistency when we had long winning streaks. wow i used that word pretty often in this post; now i feel like http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:r76UuKpceq3q9M:http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2005/writers/richard_deitsch/10/20/morgan.website/tx_joemorgan_all.jpg