Jump to content
Cubs-Brewers game thread is live — talk the game with us! ×
North Side Baseball

sneakypower

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,524

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by sneakypower

  1. sneakypower
    Apparantly not. Maybe it's because no one is typing in green. if the jokes are so corny and flat-out dumb that you have to develop a way to telegraph them, maybe that should serve as some type of indication just not to make them in the first place
  2. sneakypower
    Jackson hasn't had a good game since week 7, that's a hell of a leap of faith to take. you don't need to make that gamble, Turner is the 5th most productive RB in fantasy football. thinking about matchups over talent caused me to start Hillis over Deangelo Williams and nearly ruin my season. Turner's scored more points than Peterson
  3. sneakypower
    Not a fan of his at all. Not a very good K/9, rather high H/9, and outside of 2007, he's shown a tendency to give up the longball. He's more BABIP dependent because of his lower K rate, but he's been fine with HR rate aside from when he got hurt in '05. I'm not suggesting he be a staple of the bullpen, but we could probably do worse than bringing him in for a year to be a middle reliever. and he'd likely fare even better with BABIP if we had a defensive stud in say, CF
  4. sneakypower
    fangraphs makes life worth living
  5. sneakypower
    well....yeah, i can agree with that. See, I can do it too. Get ready, you know Alabama is back. And it is good to be hated again. i didn't edit your post it was a freudian slip
  6. sneakypower
    well....yeah, i can agree with that.
  7. sneakypower
    do what you want, it's just odd that you had the same reaction to both goals. the first one only a handful of players in the league are capable of making, the second could have been scored by any talented forward in that spot. the Wings played it terribly
  8. sneakypower
    ? that was an unremarkable goal Um... down 2-0 (against the best team in the west, and MAYBE the NHL).... And they take the lead with 4 seconds left... Toews 2 goals in 3 minutes? i'm well aware how good Detroit is, but that's just a skills competition shot most skilled players can make. i'm baffled with 5 seconds the def didn't collapse on him
  9. sneakypower
    ? that was an unremarkable goal
  10. sneakypower
    unbelievable
  11. sneakypower
    your comprehension is severely lacking; he didn't say that
  12. sneakypower
    that was creepy
  13. sneakypower
    What, no love for Waitress? Alabama is a little better than I thought. cmon Keri Russell isn't that manly
  14. sneakypower
    i liked Tebow in that Serenity movie
  15. sneakypower
    Pie to Balt makes no sense whatsoever
  16. sneakypower
    that one looked pretty good because his WR was open for 20 yds he has 0 chance for success in the NFL
  17. sneakypower
    Tebow really can't throw for [expletive] who knew
  18. sneakypower
    priorpower's rocking my world in this thread so the cardinals MI would be better next year with KJ/KG, Ludwick will probably regress from 1380 OPS and Rasmus' rookie season might be a rocky one hows my mind? yeah its blown you heard it here first folks, treasure that exclusive hard-hitting analysis what do you see from Pujols in 09? personally i think he might have a good year imo
  19. sneakypower
    today's baseball stars are all guys named Rodriguez to me
  20. sneakypower
    Don't think so...but fortunately I was online to go to the server and reset the connections. sorry about that i was curious so i did a search query of "roast" and "girlfriend" and next thing i know i got a server maxed out crash error
  21. sneakypower
    No I didn't. I had us at like 90 wins or something. As for the rest of the difference. Sorry I didn't foresee Ryan Dempster becoming a bit of a pitching God and Mark DeRosa having the best year of his career by a significant margin. I can't be Nostradamus or anything. I didn't have us in the low 80s last season. I probably said we had a 30 percent chance going into 2007 though. yes you did emphasis yours
  22. sneakypower
    in that case my thoughts and prayers are with them both
  23. sneakypower
    well i wouldn't say everyone...
  24. sneakypower
    By my numbers, right now the Cubs are probably a true 88 or so win team. The Cubs probability of getting in the post season with 88 wins is probably 50%, maybe a little higher given the sad state of our division. If the Greene was just a slight upgrade (say 3 wins) over Theriot those 3 wins, probably increase the chances of us getting into the playoffs by 30-40%. The playoff revenue generated by the higher probability is likely to offset the 6 million extra spent....not to mention the 30-40% higher chance of getting into the playoffs...and possibly DOUBLING or TRIPLING our chances of getting a world series win. All for a six million. dude you said we had a 30% chance of making the playoffs last year and we won the division by like 30 games
  25. sneakypower
    ...we do?
×
×
  • Create New...