Because if you read further down, you get to this: It's not much of a fallback when Grissom hit .267/.299/.396/.695 against righties over the last 3 seasons. If Murton tanks so badly that Marquis Grissom can take his spot everyday, then he doesn't deserve to be in the majors. Murton has far too much plate discipline for that to happen. I read that part of the article, and basically it says that if X, Y, Z, XX, YY, and ZZ all occur, then Grissom may be an option in LF over Murton. You took the worst case scenario that the article just spent 500 words debunking as highly unlikely and made it the centerpiece of an argument. edit: sorry, you weren't the OP. :oops: