Jump to content
North Side Baseball

USSoccer

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    17,655
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by USSoccer

  1. Quoted for truth. Then it's a good thing ghe wont get extended til the offseason.
  2. I think he's in better shape than he was last year. If we get up 8-0 by the 7th or 8th I'd sit him.
  3. Jones is trying to one-up Encarnacion...
  4. Because it tells us that Dusty has at least some brain activity. and if it's used in the right spot at some point this season, it might win us a game...
  5. The nice thing is that they have taken advantage of their scoring opportunities so far.
  6. It's nice to see Suppan remembering he isn't that good...
  7. I was waiting for that sqeeze there...
  8. Is Brenly really cranking about Cedeno calling time after his slide?
  9. I think the wind helped it a little, but it was dead on target.
  10. He's double clutching those grounders...
  11. Murton should have taken that one.
  12. THAT ball should have been crushed....
  13. Don't know why you would IBB Jones.
  14. I'm just glad someone is on ahead of Lee and Ramirez...
  15. Neifi with a seeing eye popup single.
  16. USSoccer

    Also, if you put stock into that website's Best/Worst Case outcomes, Aldridge and Morrison have the best upside and safest downside. I'd say that Noah and Thomas have really "meh" upsides, and frighteningly bad worst cases.
  17. USSoccer

    Other than Andre Miller, who was I hard on? Marbury has averaged 20 ppg consistently in the NBA. Kurt Thomas has been very successful. Bonzi Wells is at least decent. Tim Thomas, Mercer, Jason Williams, Barry, Odom, Maggette, Gooden are all solid players. Again, would you draft Marbury if you could do it all over again? Would you want him on your team? Ditto for Wells. That next group you mentioned are not successful relative to their draft position. I didn't think that was the point. I thought it was to show that a lot of top 15 picks have not been successful. It wasn't about who I would take on the Bulls or who is successful relative to their draft position. My overall point was to look at top 15 picks and not only see who was successful, but who was successful relative to their draft position. I think looking at the draft you see just about every "project" type guy, or one dimensional player ends up being a fringe NBA regular. Very few of them succeed. I mean, if you are the Bulls, and you have the 1st and 15th overall picks, how should you spend them? Should you take a project-type player with that 1st pick like Thomas? As athletic as he is, he is still a work in progress. He has a negligible offensive ability. He doesn't shoot very well. At 6-9 he's an undersized 4. He's not good enough to be a 3 on a team with Deng and Nocioni. He is very good defensively, has the leaping ability and the wingspan, and shows flashes of explosiveness offensively. Plus, your chances of developing such a raw player into a solid NBA player worth that #1 pick are low, looking at the past 9 drafts. Or do you take Noah, a more polished offensive player, just as intense, taller, more mature, with that pick, knowing that your likely range of outcome with Noah is better than with Thomas? Or do you take Roy, knowing that he fills a need, can score, plays defense, and as a senior is more fundamentally polished? Is upside worth more than a more stable commodity? Both Roy and Noah fill more of a need that Thomas, so given that and the risk of drafting a freshman who's raw historically, which way do you go?
  18. That Bud Light daredevil is an idiot.
  19. I see...so both teams have forsaken the #2 spot... :P The Cards lineup is uglier than the Cubs. Where's Molina?
×
×
  • Create New...