Or you just miss the obvious potential Eyre deal. I don't think Hendry would add a third LH arm for no reason. It doesn't make sense to me to trade for Cotts to be your LH set-up man. That's what I'm saying. If another team has a woody for Cotts, then it makes sense to trade 2 pitchers for him. I just don't see the point in acquiring Cotts as the guy you will fall back on once dealing Eyre (which I'm in favor of). What if Ohman becomes the LH set up man and Cotts is the LOOGY? Cotts couldn't loogy in 2004 or 2006. I'd rather a loogy be a LH who actually gets out lefties routinely. I'll assume that this move is just a setup move for a different trade. If Hendry deals Eyre for Westbrook, I won't care if Cotts can't get me out, since it improves the rotation. If Cotts is the one who moves along with, say Jones or Izturis, I'll dance a jig on my desk. If we keep all 3 or trade Ohman for Cliff Lee, I'll be unhappy.