This has been a really interesting conversation. I'm not necessarily all about declaring myself in one camp or another, but there are some positives here that the anti-Soriano camp are missing, and some negatives that bear mentioning. Soriano didn't really get more patient last season. He showed an increase in BB's that was heavily influenced by IBB's. He also set a career high in K's, and while he also set one in p/PA, it wasn't like a huge increase. I have doubts that his swing will age well as he loses bat speed, and I have severe doubts about his ability to ever improve his palte discipline. Also, his contract is obviously very risky. Even 6/$90m with options is a lot of money for someone who's not even the best offensive player on your team. If he plays RF, that's the toughest OF position in Wrigley. That bears watching. On the other hand, Soriano will provide one of the 2 things the Cubs offense was lacking: SLG%. He's not going to be an on-base maven, but he will slug. I would be stunned if he hit less than 35 HR's. If he puts up his career averages we're a much better offense right now than we were at any point in 2005-6. Depending on other factors, the Cub offense will improve to at least 2003 levels, and come close to 2004 levels depending on other moves. The fact that we signed him means we now have some flexibility with the tradable assets we still hold. We have 4 relievers, Jones, Izturis and some minor league players with which to deal. Assuming we still are looking for a CF, Boston could move Coco Crisp for Izturis and Eyre, and I'd take that deal. I'm also assuming Hendry will also look to deal for a starter. Given the lack of quantity and quality in the FA market, Hendry seems to have done a halfway decent job of maximizing the cards in his hand. Of the 4 best offensive FA's, we retained one and brought a second in. 2/4 is not half bad. I don't think this move should be judged solely on Soriano's plate discipline. Even supporters of this move should concede that it's terrible and not likely to improve. Likewise, his contract is bad, but at least for the first 3 years we should get good production from him. I'm thinking that this is an overall positive for the team, but it's not all that clear cut. Should it be clear cut for $17m per? Maybe it should be, but the Cubs are not in a position to pick and choose. I'd have been happier with Drew, but am okay with this.