It's brought about more change than mediocrity has. Ask Jim Riggleman and Don Baylor. Well Riggleman was in charge in 98 when the Cubs sneaked into the Wild Card. Perfect example though, he was fired 2 years later and Baylor was brought in. What did that do? Nothing. Baylor gets fired and Baker is brought in the following year. Besides 2003, what has that done? Nothing. I'm not arguing some changes need to be made, some do. But the Cubs could lose every game the rest of the year, it still woudln't bring a winning team any faster. If anything it would drive potential players away from wanting to come here. It isn't going to be an overnight thing, 2003 was a fluke. They will have to start from the bottom and instill the philosophies and qualities of a winning organization. Losing the rest of our games will not deter players from coming here. They are motiviated by money. How else can you explain Mike Hampton going to the Rockies? We cannot instill philosophies and qualities of a winning organization with the regime we have in place. Why? Our record and recent trends speak for themselves. To start from the bottom requires dramatic changes.