it's not even close. in baseball, the odds of getting hurt while playing at full speed are relatively small - most pitchers just get hurt in long-term stuff and a lot of position players get hurt in random hamstring pulls or getting hit by a pitch. there's no contact so basically pitchers throw the same pitches at the same speeds that they do in "regular" games and hitters try to do the same things that they do in "regular" games. the scores of mlb all-star games are very similar to scores of other baseball games - some are high-scoring, some are low-scoring, but if you take the long-term average, it's very close to the average scoring in games. nfl, nba and nhl all star games are have very little of the contact and defensive commitment that characterize "normal" games in those sports, and scoring is far higher than in regular season games. I'll agree the ASG is better, but not to the extent that it's significantly better than the Pro Bowl. My point isn't so much to bash the ASG - because I watch and enjoy the ASG. Maybe it's just personal preference, but I don't see the huge difference in the quality of the games. You clearly really love NFL football, but I can't believe you're really making these arguments. I guess it's just personal preference. I don't really get that excited for any of the all-star games, so maybe that's clouding my judgement. Sure, everyone likely has a preference. But I'm just surprised that someone watching last night's pro bowl would argue that it's comparable to the MLB ASG. I wouldn't say either is "exciting," but the ASG more accurately reflects an actual MLB game. Pedro striking out McGwire, Sosa, and whomever with nasty stuff 10 years ago. Bonds being robbed of a HR (and then picking Hunter up in jest afterwards). There are all-out efforts in almost every MLB ASG. In the Pro Bowl players just can't do that.