Jump to content
North Side Baseball

cheapseats

Verified Member
  • Posts

    4,418
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by cheapseats

  1. Really? I don't know for a fact, but I thought Pie was much faster than pretty much anyone else except Soriano. I don't know that 1/100 of a second is going to make a difference in scoring, esp. with an unproven rookie. Pie is much faster, and a much better defender. It's a perfectly justifiable move. I'm all for the move for defense alone. Murton's speed is underrated. His infield hit percentage was 7.9%, 25th in all of MLB last year and tied with Chone Figgins. But yes, Pie is faster.
  2. Agreed. The hitters need to practice their clutch hitting and the pitchers need to work on their approach in high leverage situations.
  3. Murt beats out the grounder and Jacque scores!
  4. I doubt the Cubs would even consider it, but there's no reason he couldn't pitch an inning. There's a very good reason why he shouldn't. If it was routine for him to pitch in game action on his throw day, then I'd be fine with it. But throw days are not the same as game days. There's little to no benefit to screwing with his schedule. Throw days are different for different pitchers, but most throw at 95% or so for about 50 pitches. It was normal for starting pitchers to pitch an inning or two in relief in between starts (instead of a throw day) as recently as the 70's. Pettitte has done in twice this season, and a pitcher on one of those NL West teams (me and my east coast bias) has done it, too. I'd be all for making it routine - especially with veteran pitchers.
  5. I doubt the Cubs would even consider it, but there's no reason he couldn't pitch an inning.
  6. It can't be called I can't say I'm a fan of this rule, but then again, I can't really decide what I would think if the situation was reversed. I generally operate under the assumption that baseball doesn't need any new rules. That's not a result of any new rule, is it? In the past the home team always got to bat in the bottom of the inning if the visitors were winning before the game could be called, IIRC. From the sounds of things, in the past it would have reverted to the last full inning and the Cubs probably would have lost already. I definitely like the new rule. After the 5th inning, no runs should come off the board. Right. That's my understanding of the old rule.
  7. .156 .224 .267 I sure am glad the Cubs didn't sign Steve Finley. Why is he getting starts for Colorado? And why is he LEADING OFF?
  8. It can't be called I can't say I'm a fan of this rule, but then again, I can't really decide what I would think if the situation was reversed. I generally operate under the assumption that baseball doesn't need any new rules. That's not a result of any new rule, is it? In the past the home team always got to bat in the bottom of the inning if the visitors were winning before the game could be called, IIRC.
  9. Pitt announcers are talking about eating carpet ?!?
  10. Karma: Rafael Furcal collided with Eric Byrnes at second base. At first it looked like Furcal hurt his glove hand, but he's staying in the game.
  11. I just noticed the White Sox are playing an away game tonight, too. What's going on, schedulers?
  12. 12-2 Brewers over St. Louis with half an inning to play. St. Louis kind of sucks.
  13. That Tony Graffanino homerun is really going to help my fantasy team!
  14. hater, that thing is P I M P Dusty is no Azuma. Pics, plz.
×
×
  • Create New...