Looked like good hard-nosed baseball to me. It's definitlely no worse than plowing into a catcher who doesn't have the ball. To me, a catcher impeding the path of the baserunner when he does not have the ball is different than a runner going out of the baseline to break up a double play. Agree to disagree. It's just unfortunate that MLB is so vague with the rules in these types of situations. Thames was able to put both hands on the bag in the play I saw, so he wasn't really too far from the bag. His objective was to break-up the DP and he did. It's legal and considered clean. ITS 2005 GRINDERBALL. Had the White Sox done, that, it would be another part of their marketing slogan for Ozzieball, Grinderball, whatever idiotic name you wanna call it. GRINDER RULE NUMBER 130: DEFEAT YOUR OPPONENT... ANYWAY POSSIBLE! That would be more appropriate for defeating another team, w/ a pic of Buerhle hitting Hafner in the face And once again you provide no proof for why Buehrle would throw an 80 mph pitch at someone's face. It put him on the DL for a month Considering they went 11-7 with him on the DL, I'd say it wasn't a huge setback. Also consider the fact that the Indians were 14 GB when Hafner was hit. Nice theory though, Buehrle threw one of his rocket 80 mph sinkers at Hafner's face (who, if you do not remember, did not move out of the way) in order to hold back the team that was so ruthlessly breathing down their necks.