Yes, we know White Sox fans have an anti-ESPN agenda, just like they have an anti-Jay Mariotti agenda, and an anti-Cubs agenda. I'm actually an anti-Give credit to a manager for a rapid turnaround he had little-to nothing to do with. Leyland overmanages more than TLR, Dusty, Ozzie, and any other "old school" manager combined. Most managers don't have anything to do with how a team performs in baseball. It's more the talent. Ozzie got his time on ESPN when the White Sox won the World Series, so I wouldn't be bitching. I never said anything to the contrary, but I am a Sox fan, so civilized discourse is impossible. Also, does anyone think they'll fall apart? I just can't see how this will keep up, but many said that about the Sox and they just got all the breaks. Maybe it's their year. I don't think they'll fall apart. If anyone falters down the strecth, I think it will be the White Sox b/c the starters will run out of gas, and the bullpen will be underworked due to all the innings the starters are eating. Most every pitcher has been on a very strict 110 pitch count the entire season. The whole staff is known for being innings eaters, so it's not an anamoly. Keep in mind that the Sox are 5-1 vs. the Tigers, and that the Sox have a better pitching staff (debatable, I guess) and a much better lineup. Um, yeah, and we've owned the Cardinals and look where that's gotten us. It'll take a lot more than owning the Tigers to win the division. You're comparing apples and oranges. The Cubs have beaten the Cardinals in recent years, but have faltered against other teams. Like Flamez said, they've done a lot against more than just the Tigers, plus there's no doubt in my mind they are the better team. They're 5-1 and still have 3-4 (?) series left with them.