Jump to content
North Side Baseball

bukie

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,573
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by bukie

  1. Inanimate carbon rod?
  2. So, three options at WR against a team that is most likely going to murder me anyway: Maclin v NYJ Torrey Smith @ SD Pierre Garcon v TEN I'm leaning Smith, actually, but it's pretty much a toss-up to me.
  3. Hey, creepy, douchey, and ignorant. The trifecta from Phil Rogers, ladies and gentlemen!
  4. He's a fastball-slider pitcher, with a second type of slider and a cutter as his tertiary pitches. As to whether they're good enough for 3rd/4th major league pitches, it's hard to say, but they're good enough for the professional Japanese league, which is better than AAA.
  5. If that's what Zimmermann can consistently put up, and Darvish can match it, I'd be a happy camper. Assuming a player peak at 27-29 years old, a rough projection with a 4.3 fWAR baseline would mean a total of 25 WAR of production over a 5 year period (~29 over 6). So, if, say, the posting bid is 50 million, and the contract is 5/50 or even 6/70, the winning team would still net value.
  6. Zimmerman's probably the best comp. Same age, same plus pitches, similar walk rates, similar groundball and strikeout rates in the minors, plus it even builds in some injury risk. Zimmerman's 2011 production projected to 200 innings would be 4.3 fWAR.
  7. This reads a little weird until you realize it should say there were 11 25 and under MLB pitchers Yeah, edited to clarify.
  8. An article on Fangraphs looks to find a current MLB equivalent to Yu Darvish. Darvish: 25 years old, 10.7 K/9, 57% groundball rate, 94 MPH fastball velocity. There were 11 25 year old major league pitchers last year who pitched at least 150 innings. Four (Wade Davis, Dillon Gee, Jair Jurrjens, Josh Collmenter) are soft tossers, and three others (David Price, Gio Gonzalez, Matt Harrison) are lefty. That leaves four potential comparables: Felix Hernandez, Jordan Zimmerman, Johnny Cueto and Yovani Gallardo. How much would you pay to get one of those four players, if all it took was cash?
  9. Peyton Hillis may actually be your best option there.
  10. By calling it Theogate, I hereby revoke your pass.
  11. Retweeted by Ace So like 120%? Someone should ask him the chances of getting Varitek and Wakefield to come to Chicago, so we can get a baseline.
  12. I don't believe his birthdate any more than I believe Aramis Ramirez'. Why on earth wouldn't you believe Aramis's? I don't believe his birthdate any more than I believe my own.
  13. It seems so weird to me that Zambrano is 6 months younger than CJ Wilson.
  14. Other than the fluke run in 2002, the last time they made it past the second round is 1994.
  15. So...they're starting Billups as the SG then?
  16. That wasn't credible. This time it is. I'd say I'd at least want to see an ESPN article on it before buying into it too much, but said article would probably be written by Rogers anyway.
  17. Of course, this is the same Phil Rogers that said just 8 hours ago the Cubs were looking at Varitek and Wakefield, just because.
  18. Out of curiosity, what does that look like if you normalize his 2010 where he was hurt like half the year? His 2009, you mean? If you extrapolate his 2009 production to his normal service time (130 games), the sum total was 4.5 WAR over the past 3 years.
  19. What, you wouldn't want to be paying a slower, worse fielding Carlos Pena 25 mil a year for the next five? :)
  20. Soriano's contract is a sunk cost, so whether he's getting 200 AB or 600 AB is irrelevant. Maximizing his value is what's relevant.
  21. Ramirez thought he could do better than 1 year and 16 million in free agency. He got 2/20 with an option for 3/32, so I guess he was right? the mutual option is for a 4th year. he got 3 for 32 with a mutual option for a 4th year that doesn't appear to be disclosed, but if it's declined by the team he gets an additional $4M Ahh, well then it's not quite as ridiculously cheap as I thought it was.
  22. To be fair, I'm not sure the Cubs wanted him to pick up his option. They could have easily just been capitalizing on the fact that they knew he wanted a multi-year deal. By making Aramis decline both his option and arbitration, they saved 2 million and picked up a draft pick. Which is one thing the prior regime failed to do repeatedly with outgoing free agents.
  23. Ramirez thought he could do better than 1 year and 16 million in free agency. He got 2/20 with an option for 3/32, so I guess he was right?
  24. Or, you know, it could be that the Cubs were interested in trying to bring him back for a one year deal, and Ramirez didn't want anything less than 3 years. Or Ramirez hates cute nicknames for his front office.
  25. Hey, let's not let facts get in the way of trying to point out everybody else's hypocrisy.
×
×
  • Create New...