Bears easily have the best LBs. Of course, I think the Vikings advantage on the DLine is as big of an advantage as there is at any position in the division. QB- Bears, Packers, Vikings, Lions RB- Vikings, Bears, Lions, Packers - I like Kevin Smith a lot, and I'd take him and Rudi slightly over Grant and Brandon Jackson WR- Packers, Lions, Vikings, Bears- if you include TEs and RBs in the pass game, the Bears pass the Vikings OL- Vikings, Bears, Packers, Lions - Bears OL will be improved, Packers OL gave up more sacks run games were similar DL- Vikings, Bears, Lions, Packers LB- Bears, Vikings, Packers, Lions DB- Packers, Vikings, Bears, Lions I will say though, that ranking like this really does nothing. The key is not who is better, but by how much. What if a team is so far better at a couple positions but a close 3rd everywhere else? Is it fair to give equal weight to having the best OL in the division and having the best DBs?