Oh the humanity. Aren't you an IU guy? Do you pity every single Hoosiers player who never played in a bowl game? Bowl game appearances are not a birthright. Yes, I am an IU guy. No I don't pity Hoosiers players who have never played in a bowl game because they know the odds are against them going to a bowl when they're only scholarship offers are IU, Bowling Green and Eastern Michigan. Bowl games are not a birthright, but it makes no sense that a group of kids good enough to get to play in a bowl game in Florida, Texas or California are forced to only play games in places like Madison, WI and Bloomington, IN because of something people did starting when the players were 4-6 years old. Again, I know that's how these things work...but that doesn't make it right. That is absurdly stupid. Bowl games are rewards for successful seasons. You are not guaranteed bowl games. Penn State missed a bowl game in four of five seasons last decade all by themselves. The kids can leave if they want. Nothing is being taken from them. The football program had to be punished and there is no way to punish the football program without something like no bowl game appearances. Really? I've [expletive] said your last sentence several times in this thread. And when did I say bowl game were guaranteed? They are definitely more likely at Penn St. than at IU, which is why good football players go to Penn St. over IU. And it's complete BS that nothing is being taken from these kids. Their first choice of where to go to school is being taken away. If they stay at PSU, their chance of having success is being taken away. Again, THIS IS HOW IT WORKS, CURRENT PLAYERS HAVE ALWAYS GOTTEN PUNISHED FOR PAST DISCREPANCIES AND THERE IS NO WAY AROUND THIS (figured I should bold it since you apparently can't read it when I type it normal), but I still think it is unfair to people who had nothing to do with the situation.