Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Chocolate Milk

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,507

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Chocolate Milk

  1. Chocolate Milk
    That's absurd. It was crappy all game. It was windy the whole time. Even if the rain was not coming down at the specific time, it was going off and on all night, and poured on occasion. If you're going to worry about a QB handling the weather, look at Brady or Eli this weekend. Grossman handled it as well as any QB could handle the weather. Grossman's problems had nothing to do with the weather, I agree.
  2. Chocolate Milk
    Wisconsin hasn't beat a team with less than 4 losses all year. You can only play the teams on your schedule. Their BCS ranking would normally qualify for a BCS game. The BCS takes SoS into account. I don't know what else to tell you.
  3. Chocolate Milk
    I'm hoping Wisconsin can somehow back into the BCS picture. Because of the silly 2 teams per conference rule, the Badgers are likely to be left out despite, what I think will be, a top 6 BCS ranking. Our only hope is if Michigan completely obliterates OSU.
  4. Chocolate Milk
    I guess this is where I should put this. http://www.patriots.com/news/index.cfm?ac=latestnewsdetail&pid=22463&pcid=41 Patriots to install field turf by the Bears game.
  5. Chocolate Milk
    section 119. Lower level, corner of east end zone. Walking in I heard a Giants fan say "Man, there are a lot of Bears fans here." I went with a friend who is a Giants fan. I was in section 305. I hate how Giants stadium shows no important replays. It's bizarre and it makes it hard to figure out what's going on, especially during reviews. They will never show a replay of a play that could be at all construed as negative against the Giants. My friend pointed that out right away and it was noticable all game. I figured that was the case. I still figured they would show the reviews considering they all went the Giant's way.
  6. Chocolate Milk
    section 119. Lower level, corner of east end zone. Walking in I heard a Giants fan say "Man, there are a lot of Bears fans here." I went with a friend who is a Giants fan. I was in section 305. I hate how Giants stadium shows no important replays. It's bizarre and it makes it hard to figure out what's going on, especially during reviews.
  7. Chocolate Milk
    Goony where did you sit? There were a bunch of Bears fans there.
  8. Chocolate Milk
    I just got back and you should have seen that place after the 108 yard return. You could have heard a pin drop. Awesome. A lot of people were trash talking because of my Rex jerset early, but that ended pretty quick. Hester=speed.
  9. Chocolate Milk
    Vick. Though you probably wouldn't go wrong with either. Vick's Rushing yards = $$$$$
  10. Chocolate Milk
    That would the Cubbie way. No doubt. If I had a nickle for all of the Cubs' postseason heros, I'd be a rich man.
  11. Chocolate Milk
    :?:
  12. Chocolate Milk
    You are right about one thing: Todd Johnson sucks. Manning has been a dissapointment thus far, as well. Chris Harris is off the injury report. What's his story? He should be on the field over Johnson, IMO. It looks like Bradley is going to see a lot of action.
  13. Chocolate Milk
    Seriously? By my count, the Giants are going to be missing 5 defensive starters (Osi, Strahan, Arrington, Madison, Short). Also backups Tuck and Emmons are questionable. I don't understand how they could be so confident with so many injuries. They don't have good depth. :shock: ... Actually, the Giants have pretty darn good depth ... good enough to hold two teams to 10 or less points with alot of starters out the last two weeks ... Have you watched the Giants at all? The Giants do have good depth. Of course, that all goes out the window when your "depth" is forced into the first string. I agree, but to state the Giants don't have good depth is plain wrong. I was refering specifically to this game where they have some backups who are also banged up. They started a DE off the practice squad last week. Normally they have great DE depth, but not for this game. With so many defensive players hurt, if someone gets hurt in this game they could be in big trouble. Sorry for the confusion. The Giants are the team I follow the most other than the Bears. Edit: Let's be honest about the last two games, as well. One game was played in a hurricane against the 2nd worst offensive team in football and the other was played against the Texans, the 6th worst offensive team in football.
  14. Chocolate Milk
    I'm concerned that Gordon hasn't gotten more consistant. It's early though.
  15. Chocolate Milk
    +1 JD Drew please.
  16. Chocolate Milk
    When Aram is a Dodger next week my point will be more clear. You don't have a point.
  17. Chocolate Milk
    ?? Do you think Hendry doesn't have time for both?
  18. Chocolate Milk
    Nope. Miller: 21.2 IP, 1.71 WHIP, 1.11 K/BB, 1.66 HR/9, .232/.376/.402/.771 line against Marshall: 125.2 IP, 1.52 WHIP, 1.30 K/BB, 1.43 HR/9, .270/.356/.444/.795 line against Marmol: 77 IP, 1.69 WHIP, 1.00 K/BB, 1.63 HR/9, .250/.386/.482/.862 line against Guzman: 56 IP, 1.88 WHIP, 1.62 K/BB, 1.44 HR/9, .308/.416/.507/.915 line against Mateo: 45.2 IP, 1.62 WHIP, 1.52 K/BB, 1.18 HR/9, .288/.376/.475/.841 line against Ryu: 15 IP, 1.93 WHIP, 2.83 K/BB, 4.26 HR/9, .348/.419/.758/1.160 line against :?: Not helping your cause here.
  19. Chocolate Milk
    That's what I was thinking too. He probably shouldn't expect a lot of Cover-1 bump and run. Most of the comments are ok, it's just funny how these guys do this every week, and really only Boldin and Taylor have been able to back it up at all. He probably should. I think the Beloved will load up to stop Barber.
  20. Chocolate Milk
    Seriously? By my count, the Giants are going to be missing 5 defensive starters (Osi, Strahan, Arrington, Madison, Short). Also backups Tuck and Emmons are questionable. I don't understand how they could be so confident with so many injuries. They don't have good depth.
  21. Chocolate Milk
    Hrm, not sure what to make of this. I suppose it's both good and bad.
  22. Chocolate Milk
    This is the fear of both of my brothers (Giants season ticket holders). Before the Dolphins game, I was talking to my brother and he said that the worst case senario for the Giants was the Bears losing to the Dolphins.
  23. Chocolate Milk
    I think a little of this is in order:
  24. Chocolate Milk
    I'm I overreacting to this by hoping that such considerations (OBP, Strike Zone Discipline) will branch over to player acquisitions? Perhaps this is why we haven't heard much on the Pierre front? Is management finally figuring things out?
  25. Chocolate Milk
    Sounds great. Swinging at pitches in the zone also means swinging at pitches that can be hit hard. Not only could this help with OBP but it could also help with SLG.
×
×
  • Create New...