What makes Walker more valuable than Ward? Ward had the better year last year by far. Before that, Walker had the better years-but if Ward regresses back to his usual year and Walker keeps declining, then Ward will likely be slightly better. Both can play 3 positions-Walker the 3 in the infield, Ward the two in the OF and 1B. What is there to justify eating a million by dropping Ward and signing Walker? Please read what I wrote. I said, pretty clearly, that it was worth considering. I did not say that Walker was better than Ward. You should always look to improve your team, and if Walker is an upgrade, then it might be worth it. I remember Walker being really bad as a pinch hitter for us though. I don't see the value in him right now for us. There are no guarantees of Ward repeating last year. Pinch hitting numbers aren't very reliable in predicting future performance. Just got back from ST, and the only player who looked bad, and I mean like not ready to contribute bad, was Ward. He looked injured and/or out of shape. Either he is simply not ready to start the season physically due to lack of training or there is something wrong with him. His numbers this spring reflect what was undeniable to the naked eye. Here's hoping that he's okay. If he's not, and the Cubs pass on Walker, Floyd should be able to fill in as the back-up 1B, but it would be nice to have more than one lefty bat off the bench. If I'm Hendry, I'm having a talk with the trainer about Daryl, opening up a bottle of wine and thinking long and hard about whether or not to swallow my pride and contact Walker's agent. too bad coats is injured. he would have been next in line if there is an issue with ward's health.