Sagarin has ND at 19 and Oregon at 34 Anderson and Hester had ND at 42 and Oregon at 55 Colley has ND at 54 and Oregon at 55 Massey has ND at 38 and Oregon at 55 ND Average: 38.25 Oregon Average: 49.75 These are 4 of the 6 computer rankings used. The other two (Billingsley and Wolf) did not have SOS, that I could find. I guess that when looking at Oregons schedule (or any schedule for that matter) you have to look at more than just their opponents win/loss column. Lets take a winning team on Oregons schedule and compare it to a losing team on NDs schedule. Oregon: Houston finished 6-5. They beat Sam Houston, Tulsa, Tulane, Miss St, So Miss, and Rice. They lost to UTEP, Memphis, C Florida, SMU, and Oregon. They played in C-USA, not a very strong conference at all. According to Sagarin they are the 9th ranked conference. Notre Dame: Tennesse finished 5-6. They beat UAB, LSU, Ole Miss, Memphis and Kentucky. They lost to Florida, Georgia, Alabama, S Carolina, ND, and Vanderbilt (4 teams in the top 20). They played in the SEC, the 5th ranked conference. Now some would say that Oregon beat a team that is "bowl eligible" by beating Houston. But is a victory over a 6-5 Houston team better than a victory over a 5-6 Tennesse team? Lets look at one more, just to be fair. Oregon: Montana (1AA) finished 8-4. They beat...well does it matter, they are IAA! But some say they are 8-4 and use that to count towards Oregons opponents records when debating how tough their schedule is. ND: Purdue finished 5-6. They had a terrible season, true but Sagarin has the Big 10 ranked as the#1 conference, and would anyone actually argue that a 5-6 Big 10 team is worse than a 8-4 AA team? It really is a tough debate over who's schedule is worse, but I really feel the NDs schedule, though weak, is stronger than Oregons.