Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Rob

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    15,251
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Rob

  1. Ok, it's official, one of Burgess or Harvey will fall to us... it's just a question of if we take them.
  2. Damn, Justin Jackson is off the board. Great pick by the Jays.
  3. 4 picks to go before our next, and Burgess and Harvey still on the board.
  4. Burgess and Harvey are still there... c'mon guys.
  5. Side note: I looked up Brooks Kieschnick's old numbers right after the Nats grabbed Smoker, and everybody has started doing real strange things in the draft since then.
  6. He was projected to be an overdraft in the third... I love it.
  7. This kind of pick is why the Rockies are a doormat. Wasting the #8 pick on a reliever whose one plus over everybody else is his ability to help this year... when the Rockies still wont compete with or without him.
  8. Huzzah! Brewers drafted trade bait instead of an actual player.
  9. If you believe most of the rumors, disheartening and painful.
  10. Baseball America's latest blog posts seem to think that Vitters is going to fall to #3, and if he does, that the Cubs would take him over Parker. And the one right after that says that the Cubs and Parker were trying to work out a predraft deal for 2.35 mil.
  11. The Cubs have had a very poor track record when it comes to drafting high school hitters... but more importantly, the Cubs have a need at catcher, and also have a need for high-OBP players. Wieters is a polished college bat who fills both those needs. That's the bigger reason why I'd hate drafting Vitters or Moustakas. Oh I agree, I want Wieters, I am just not as negative on high schoolers as you are. High school hitters do sometimes pan out too, and I do like the fact that Wilken is doing the picking. If he wants Vitters, then I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt to the point where I will wait a couple years to see how he turns out. If memory serves, the last study I read said that high school hitters, college pitchers, and college hitters all enjoyed about the same average value over the course of the time the team controlled them. High school pitchers were much worse off, and flamed out at a much higher rate. That, in a nutshell, is why I don't want Parker, or Porcello, or Bumgarner, or Aumont, or Smoker, or Harvey, or Beavan... unless of course one of them slips to us with our supplemental pick (not bloody likely)
  12. Honestly, I think we could plug Wieters straight in as our backup catcher and he'd outperform Blanco. He's the one prospect outside of Price in this draft that I feel is about as close to no risk (read: exposing to the Cubs farm system) as they come. (No Casey Weathers talk... that would be a bigger overdraft at number 3 than Matt Bush was)
  13. I think they are strongly leaning towards Vitters, but I just don't think its set in stone yet. Sadly, I see the Cubs brass split between Parker and Vitters. Rumor has it Porcello is asking for way more than the Royals are going to spend, and they're leaning towards taking Vitters now... which leaves us with a damn high school pitcher.
  14. I'd LOVE Parker. It's not like he's a bad choice, but right now I'd much rather look for an impact bat. We have almost nothing in the system as far as position players are concerned now that Pie is up and EPatt isn't looking like he can stick at 2nd. And considering all the potential impact bats available (Wieters, Vitters, Heyward, Moustakas) it just doesn't seem to fit. Besides, I'm just not too keen on a small fireballing high school pitcher... I like draft picks with arms likely to stay connected.
  15. It looks more and more in these later hours like we're going to end up with Parker... a decision I am very upset about.
  16. Good Luck. Good luck. Thanks guys! I'd wish you luck, but then there might be less available for me.
  17. He's working in the mid 90's today... looking real good. He doesn't appear to be short-arming the ball as much as he did before.
  18. Please let it be Izturis. If Z would punch Izturis everyday, it would make his crappy games much more bearable too. Seriously now, if we kept Izturis on the 25 man and paid him 4.15 mil to be Zambrano's punching bag and absolutely nothing more than an emergency replacement, I'd say that'd be money well spent.
  19. It's not a big deal until you hear "sprained ACL" or "sprained MCL." Yes. I sprained my MCL last summer and it took about 4-6 weeks to get back to an adequate level of performance. Even then I wasn't 100%. Yeah, I had a partial tear through the ACL. I was gimpy for a loooong time.
  20. I've had more knee problems than I can count. Just using ice and painkillers, I used to be able to play football again the day after a sprain. I did miss a grand total of two days with a very severe sprain once, though. Baseball players don't tend to play through pain as well as football players though. At the same time, they don't have to use their knees near so much as football players. Aramis could probably play hobbled tomorrow and not exacerbate it. If he takes 1-2 days off, he'll be at 90-95%.
  21. It's not a big deal until you hear "sprained ACL" or "sprained MCL."
  22. I've had more knee problems than I can count. Just using ice and painkillers, I used to be able to play football again the day after a sprain. I did miss a grand total of two days with a very severe sprain once, though.
×
×
  • Create New...