BigbadB
-
Posts
16,428 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by BigbadB
-
Goony has just the meme for such nonsense. He will be along shortly.
-
I'm assuming something halfway decent, although it may not be that much given the demand may be quite low.
-
Looking at the WR free agents, it's rather barren. I doubt any of the top tier WR's will be options. They either won't want to share catches with Moore, won't want anything to do with Fields if he is retained or is at risk of being retained. There aren't many second tier WR's that look all that exciting. If I had to focus on someone, it would probably be Tyler Boyd. He may end up staying in Cincy when Higgins signs elsewhere. There is still hope for cap casualties to improve the WR availables. Another reason to be mad about trading for Claypool. Maybe we get Jacobi Meyers last offseason if we don't have Claypool. I'd probably be ok with a Fields/Meyers swap of some sort. He's a really solid possession receiver.
-
Chiefs will have a tough time adding weapons as Mahomes' contract will jump another 20m this year.
-
My thought was always that trading Fields could offset the haul they won't get if they draft at #1. At the very least, it would be nice to pick up a second or an extra third rounder this year. They probably still have the resources via Free Agency and the draft to fill most of the holes, but one more pick would be nice. I don't see them trading the #9 pick since the desperation for a WR will be significant if they draft QB first.
-
That list makes things look pretty bleak. With that list, I only see maybe 3 teams that might trade for Fields, and there are at least 3 free agents that could be equal or better value that won't cost draft capital. It's obviously not this black and white, but I could see a scenario where Poles decides to draft QB and doesn't have a suitor for Fields. Wouldn't be the worst scenario by any means, but I would hope for a second or third round pick in the draft over a Fields/Rookie QB battle in camp. Atl, LV and Denver seem like the best options to trade for Fields, and if any of them come calling, Poles should be all ears.
-
Dodgers still have a few available years to defer money on future contracts.
-
They need another TE desperately. However, it can be a later round developmental/fringe TE or a free agent pickup that's better than Tonyan. I don't think you have to fear one of Odunze or Nabers not being there at #9. The combine will have new guys skyrocketing to the upper tier of the first round with crazy numbers. There's also Keon Coleman from Florida St. He's 6'4" and might pair nicely with DJ. There is another dude named Xavier Leggette from South Carolina that will be creeping up draft boards. He's 6'3" and ran a 4.29 40. Not sure how good he is at running routes or catching balls, but he is getting talked about. I'm sure one of Nabers or Odunze will be there, though. What I want to know is how willing Ryan Pace will be willing to cough up a haul to get Justin Fields. He's sitting in a place in the draft where he will miss out on at least the top 3 QB's. Probably more realistic he's learned his lesson and will go after Cousins, Wilson or the like. But, Fields is from there and it is Pace's guy.
-
I'm in a pick 'em league where we pick every game based on the spread. I finished in 2nd place after being in first place every week since about week 4, and my record was only 19 wins better than my losses for an average ratio of one more win than loss each week of the season. This is why I don't gamble. Hell, I spent a bit more time looking at the games for the final week of the regular season because my lead evaporated to just one game going into the final week. I went 7-9 on my picks. Meanwhile, a friend went 13-3 to pass the field and beat me by two games. It's only a $10 buy in and only 9 of our fantasy team managers play, so you'd be winning $80 bucks (minus the buy in) if you get first place, but that's all I need to know that I'm not winning horsefeathers if I tried to make it more of a passion.
-
Laughable seems a bit harsh. A lot of people don't live in areas where streaming works in their house. I get spotty at best live streaming. I get fuzzy, pixelized and buffering screens during live broadcasts. There are a lot more rural areas that struggle with this more than you might think. Personally, I spend enough on NFL each year, and I'm not the slightest bit interested in signing up for new apps to watch games. I also believe NFL and NBC is alienating the very same fanbase they've been attempting to build up all of these years with decisions like this. But, everything is going to pay tv sooner rather than later, so this is just one more step to get closer to that goal, I suppose.
-
Where do Belichick and McDaniels team up next?
-
While I do like the early starts, 8 am for me here, it's the only redeeming quality of games on foreign soil.
-
I can't really get a feel of what keeping Flus means to the future. I have to imagine that any decent incoming new OC will want a new QB. Flus manages his defense and let's an experienced OC shape the offense. What decent and experienced OC will want to come to Chicago and work for a HC with amazing poor success rate and try to fix a QB others have not been able to fix? At the very least, you need an OC who you would value as an interim/replacement HC if poop hits the fan so that maybe, just maybe you don't have to create a whole new cycle. I'd really be shocked if Fields stays. I would think the only way Fields stayed was if Getsy stayed.
-
Loved him so much, he gave him 2 minutes of the offseason to think he was safe. LOL.
-
My observations of this game thread the day after....... Welcome to the Kyle thread, where occasionally the discussion will occasionally venture a bit towards the Bears game. I'll never understand how someone can find enjoyment seeking fights with several people all at the same time over a whole lot of nothing. It's so easy to just say nothing sometimes when it's clear what you are about to say is going to anger someone. It's crazy easy. It doesn't even take keyboard strokes, it's that easy. With that said, FIRE EVERYONE! Well, I still like Poles.
-
I'm not sure why these guys always have to be lumped together in evaluations. While I did think Edmunds was pretty much meh all season, I thought Edwards was a standout. He never gives up on a play and seems to always be in on the tackle, if not actually making the tackle.
-
Outside of WR, I feel Center is the next biggest hole on the roster. Kramer gets to see if he can be a serviceable backup next year or if the Bears need to draft one and sign one this offseason. My bet is the Bears will have two new Centers on the roster next year.
-
This is probably the last thing I'd want to see Poles do with this offseason. There is speculation that the first pick could net 3 firsts and a couple of day 2 picks. MHJ is good, but he's not better than the next best WR and 4 other day one and day two draft picks.
-
Good call.
-
I'm dropping DirecTV as soon as our fiber optic is done installing. Might not be done before football season next year. I had YouTubeTV for awhile in California and I liked it. I think the only work around is not being able to get Marquee on YouTube, but I think I'm far enough away from Chicago to get Cubs on MLBTV. I think NBC Sports Chicago is available as well, but I'm not positive on that. Although, I'm hearing that the contract with the Blackhawks and Bulls is almost over. Not sure what happens after that.
-
The "let's put games in other countries and air games on streaming channels" thing makes things pretty ugly as well.
-
Doubt Williams would be alone. If you went Williams with the first pick, I'd imagine that the other pick would be designated for WR, whether that's Nabers, Odunze or the like. The Bears absolutely need a first round WR regardless of what they do with the other pick.
-
MHJ absolutely cannot be the first pick. The receiver class is way too strong to simply take the easy way out and select a receiver with the first pick, while ignoring the value the first pick brings to desperate teams. Outside of that, I think I'll be fine just letting Poles work his magic. He either: A) wants "his" QB and uses that pick on the best QB in the draft, while also trading Fields for pick(s). B) soft trades down one or two spots, picks up picks and takes MHJ. C) take a haul of picks to move down several places, then draft among the top remaining WR and one of the second tier QB's to be Justin's understudy/replacement. I'm actually down with any of those scenarios, although I'd probably still lean towards (A). Fields dropped back and surveyed the field better against Atl. He made more accurate throws. He tested the secondary numerous times. He limited his turnovers, and he put points on the board. If he played like that all year, I don't think we would even be considering a QB in this upcoming draft. And Fields having the team and fan support might make it hard to just trade him away if he has a great game against GB. And finally, Claypool ended up with less yards receiving with Miami than he had with the Bears this year. I loved the trade at the time, but boy does that one look horrible now. Hell, Claypool may just be out of football entirely next year.
-
So I was watching the Jets/Cleveland game Thursday. There was a play that was being reviewed and I don't remember what for now, but the strange thing that occurred during that review was they determined the play to stand as called, however, in doing the review they noticed that the defense had 12 men on the field and they called a penalty and moved them 5 yards. There was a guy who wasn't completely off the field on the snap. I was a bit shocked they did that. I don't think I've ever seen a penalty called in this manner well after the play was over, and I also don't think that should be a thing. Anyone else see that?
-
If he's a system QB, bring that damn system to Chicago! Cuz they need a system.
