Yes and no; apologies, I should have been more clear. No, a career .446 SLG isn't particularly good. But yes, a guy who hit 22 HRs in 2005, 30 in 2006 and hasn't hit fewer than 19 in any season where he's made at least 470 PAs now has the reputation, in the common sense if not the statistical sense, as a "power hitter" whether it's an accurate description or not. Now let's say Colletti or Sabean or whomever were kicking the tires on Crede. Despite our hope as more statistically-inclined baseball fans that people in the position of GM for a major league team would look at far more than just homers and RBIs, do you suppose they would give more weight to the career .446 SLG or the 92 HRs in four seasons as a "regular" (470+ PAs) third baseman?