Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Geech

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,018

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Geech

  1. Geech
    He would have to proved intent to hit him with the bat for battery which, despite a lot of conviction here, hasn't happened yet. However, that still doesn't show intent to cause harm. While battery may not require harm or even intent to cause there's still a big ethical difference there. Intent really does matter.
  2. Geech
    Well, Murton may have been hitting 250, but I guarantee you that his OBP was quite a bit higher than Pierre's even with that low average. For that matter, he's .294/.377/.456 right now, which blows Pierre away. As for the rest of your post... 6/19 = .316 avg 6/17 = .353 avg (!) 6/23 = .261 avg That .261 may represent an improvement over what Pierre has done previously but it's still significantly worse than what Cedeno and Walker are producing. Seriously, why did you even post this? Did you think no one would divide the numbers out or anything?
  3. Geech
    I was replying to this specific statement: It's far from clear that Young acted with "intent to do serious bodily harm", and, yes, intent absolutely matters. In civil terms, intent is one of the defining features of battery. But beyond even that, it's the difference between being a jerk with a bad temper and actually being a threat.
  4. Geech
    It didn't look like a soft chuck, but that absolutely did not look like a bat thrown with the intention of causing harm.
  5. Geech
    After seeing the video on ESPN, I don't think that's what happened. I couldn't see Young himself, but it looked like it probably hurt the bat more than the umpire. He hardly even flinched.
  6. Geech
    Wuertz is already one of the best in the game at missing bats. I don't know if he'll make the adjustments to become consistantly good, but I like his odds of being good a lot more than I like Tony Clark's odds of repeating is good year.
  7. Geech
    It would be hard to replace Wuertz's stuff, but Clark of 03-04 would be pretty damn replacable. I really don't like our odds of coming out ahead on a trade like that.
  8. Geech
    Len reported that Maddux was moving up one and Rusch would start on Saturday.
  9. Geech
    You should. OPSLAKDKAHGO +/- VORP is one of the most exciting new stats in the game. You'll probably see it beign reported right next to batting average during TV broadcasts soon.
  10. Geech
    Yeah, I know.
  11. Geech
    Not really, no.
  12. Geech
    That's not quite what I had in mind.
  13. Geech
    Then the solution is clear, isn't it?
  14. Geech
    E-Pat should be ready by 2007. I would like to see the Cobs give him a shot at second.
  15. Geech
    How about that pathetic throw he lobbed in from center today?
  16. Geech
    Pants are the Devil.
  17. Geech
    I bet JP's at bat ends 4-3.
  18. Geech
    You suck, Mabry.
  19. Geech
    I hate seeing Mabry's swing. Something about it really bugs me.
  20. Geech
    I think Fred is drunk.
  21. Geech
    You can't assume everything would have stayed the same. Nevertheless, a terrible decision. Why did he pull him? Anyone know?
  22. Geech
    I hope you don't get it. Silly to jinx while the team is actually still doing well in spite of the injuries (knocking wood). WAY TO NOT JINX THE TEAM, KATJ.
  23. Geech
    Actually, Daske had a problem with this specific article for being a "downer".
  24. Geech
    4 2/3 IP 5ER 6H 4BB 5K
  25. Geech
    Hey is this the thread that had ZZ's crazy "Dusty gets laid more than you guys" post? Man, that was classic.
×
×
  • Create New...